Quote (Black XistenZ @ Aug 6 2021 10:02am)
That's what happened to countless cruise ships last fall and summer. Dunno, maybe the rules were changed since then in many places, but as a cruise will stop in many different places or jurisdictions, that's still a big concern for the organizer.
The "reducing spread"-part is where the CDC has changed their recommendations. Let's go through it step by step:
- We really have to distinguish: according to recent data, the vaccinations cut the risk of a person to get infected by a factor of at least 3 (probably higher), so business owners are still justified in (a priori) expecting untested vaccinated customers to carry a lower risk of infecting their staff or other customers than untested unvaccinated.
- However, recent studies which the CDC is really playing up suggest that fully vaccinated individuals with a breakthrough infection have similar levels of viral load and thus a similar risk of infecting others as infected unvaccinated persons. I, personally, am not convinced by these studies and this conclusion, but that's where the CDC has pivoted to in recent days. It's the basis for their reversal on mask mandates for the vaccinated, it's the basis for their change in communication.
- If these findings really were true (again, I'm still skeptical), then there would be no more virological justification to treat negatively tested persons different based on their vaccination status. So shopping malls, gyms, restaurants, theaters and so on would, from a logical point of view, have to grant negatively tested unvaccinated persons the same kind of access as their vaccinated customers.
I guess ^thesnipa and ^IceMage were not up to date on these findings and thus misunderstood Johnny's statement.
Its funny that "not effective at reducing spread" is so widely talked about, and yet cases/day are drastically lower than pre-vaccine levels, deaths are lower, and deaths are mostly in the unvaccinated population.
pre-vaccine covid skeptics pointed to low fatality rates as an argument that government mitigation measures were unnecessary.
post-vaccine the goal posts shift from fatality levels, because it looks really bad for unvaccinated swine of the world, and now it's all about spread. a measure that previously many skeptics were calling for to INCREASE because they bought into herd immunity based on anecdotal reports form sparsely populated Scandinavian healthcare utopias with manageable population density.
oh and the CDC and academic studies can't be trusted for years, but now they're used as a counter?
if there's one thing im fully up to date on its the goal post shifting hypocrisy of "patriots" who idolize veterans that were drafted into wars for their country that now wont wear a mask to save grandma and dont stop to buy a paper rose from those veterans for 1$ to raise funds for the VA that's desperate for funds they dont want taxes raised to support.
any person opening with lines like "it doesnt stop the spread" isnt worth an intellectual engagement, they're lucky if i take the time to shitpost at them. im more worried about their existence in the context of overpopulation than i am threatened they might have a single thing worth listening to. hopefully their fear of the deepstate raises to a high enough degree they retreat to the mountains and their population dwindles and interbreeds so badly that they fuck their hillbilly line of inferior blood out of existence. the best case for society is for a hiker 200 years from now to stumble upon the hovels they once lived in as an archeological find.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Aug 6 2021 09:12am