Quote (bogie160 @ Apr 3 2019 06:25am)
Bold - Yes, it certainly is. For one, Mueller concludes that there was no collusion, and yet here you are still claiming collusion. I guess some people have a hard time letting this go.
Is it illegal to accept damaging but accurate information on a political rival? We know it's not illegal to pay foreigners for false information (e.g. Steele dossier), so I'm not sure anyone is going to find your argument persuasive.
Where am I claiming collusion? I said the president's son and others tried to collude, so it's absurd to think that it was "common sense" that no one on the campaign could've colluded.
Google is your friend here.
Quote (EndlessSky @ Apr 3 2019 06:34am)
Collusion isnt real. Its a word Democrats made up because they have no message. If you want proof of criminal conspiracy with foreign powers, look at the Clinton foundation.
Cool story bro.