d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearing Week
Prev15455565758443Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 104,574
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 18 2018 02:21pm


Apparently Ford nor her lawyer has responded to the offer to appear before the senate Judiciary Committee on Monday...yet.

They probably need to get their lies in order first. :/
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
Sep 18 2018 02:22pm
Quote (djman72 @ 18 Sep 2018 15:17)
I disagree. Democrats would be doing this to ANYONE. I've said it before..... the left would rage and demonize Merrick Garland if Trump chose him. Mud has been slung.


Hindsight is 20/20, but Kethledge probably didn't have as many direct political ties and no questionable perjury or rape accusations.

Democrats would certainly ree against any pick short of Garland, but Kavanaugh has turned out to be a tricky pick to ram through. Hardiman probably would have been easier, too.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,296.75
Sep 18 2018 02:24pm
Quote (Ghot @ Sep 18 2018 01:21pm)
Apparently Ford nor her lawyer has responded to the offer to appear before the senate Judiciary Committee on Monday...yet.

They probably need to get their lies in order first. :/


your boy says it never happened and has never happened and was not at the party of the date she didn't give

you can bet your ass if he's ever done anything similar he will be shitting his pants all week hoping those women don't come forward

or if it did that someone doesn't find some sort of link this week to her story

if he didn't do it he should be fine
Member
Posts: 104,574
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 18 2018 02:25pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ Sep 18 2018 04:22pm)
Hindsight is 20/20, but Kethledge probably didn't have as many direct political ties and no questionable perjury or rape accusations.

Democrats would certainly ree against any pick short of Garland, but Kavanaugh has turned out to be a tricky pick to ram through. Hardiman probably would have been easier, too.




No. The ONLY thing we know is that someone who is a democrat and supports the democrats with her money, accused Kavanaugh in July, sent the letter in July and the Dems sat on it.
Anyone can accuse anyone.

Watch...

I accuse you of deliberately assuming Kavanaugh is guilty, with no proof.
Member
Posts: 91,067
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Sep 18 2018 02:26pm
Quote (Ghot @ Sep 18 2018 02:25pm)
No. The ONLY thing we know is that someone who is a democrat and supports the democrats with her money, accused Kavanaugh in July, sent the letter in July and the Dems sat on it.
Anyone can accuse anyone.

Watch...

I accuse you of deliberately assuming Kavanaugh is guilty, with no proof.


oh the irony. to assume that someone is lying because they're a democrat to back up that someone isn't guilty because there's no proof, with no proof.

do you even read your own posts old man?
Member
Posts: 46,664
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Sep 18 2018 02:27pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Sep 18 2018 02:24pm)
if he didn't do it he should be fine


Gee, those words really tickle the civil libertarian in me.
Member
Posts: 104,574
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 18 2018 02:29pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Sep 18 2018 04:26pm)
oh the irony. to assume that someone is lying because they're a democrat to back up that someone isn't guilty because there's no proof, with no proof.

do you even read your own posts old man?




No. I'm saying that without PROOF Kavanaugh is innocent until PROVEN guilty.
On a side note, I'm ALSO saying that there's a lot of circumstantial evidence piling up that this is Democrat BS.

Two thought in one post. I understand that may be difficult for some, but lets try to keep up. :)
Member
Posts: 91,067
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Sep 18 2018 02:32pm
Quote (Ghot @ Sep 18 2018 02:29pm)
No. I'm saying that without PROOF Kavanaugh is innocent until PROVEN guilty.
On a side note, I'm ALSO saying that there's a lot of circumstantial evidence piling up that this is Democrat BS.

Two thought in one post. I understand that may be difficult for some, but lets try to keep up. :)


no one is suggesting Kav be charged with a crime, so due process doesn't apply. there is not due process in the court of public opinion. as ive told you before, your fantasies that there should be are unrealistic and inhuman. they're also something you're not capable of, and it's hypocritical to suggest you are.

there's circumstantial evidence piling up that Kav may have pulled some shady porkies level hijinks at a highschool drinking party that thankfully didn't elevate itself into a more serious crime. so what.
Member
Posts: 104,574
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 18 2018 02:35pm


You've told me many things before. It's almost like you think you know everything AND can see the future.

I hereby accuse you of thinking you know everything.

OMG look at the evidence pile up. :/
Member
Posts: 91,067
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,504.69
Sep 18 2018 02:41pm
Quote (Ghot @ Sep 18 2018 02:35pm)
You've told me many things before. It's almost like you think you know everything AND can see the future.

I hereby accuse you of thinking you know everything.

OMG look at the evidence pile up. :/


im wildly ignorant on which female underwear are semi-comparable with an undersized set of genitalia, so perhaps you do have something to teach me.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15455565758443Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll