d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Coronavirus Thread
Prev1544545546547548910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jun 11 2020 12:54pm
Cross immunity being the best explanation now.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jun 12 2020 02:36pm
From discussion with people i know:

80 years guy in bad condition (cancer etc) got covid but didn't even noticed it. (cross immunity very probably)
60 years guy got sick, feels better and get back at home... 3 weeks; Get sick again, hospital, coma, wake up, seems a bit better, then dies of CVA 2 days later.
Member
Posts: 48,827
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
Jun 13 2020 03:51pm


When discussing re-opening/closing down/staying closed, we should pay close attention to hospital and ICU availability. States across the US didn't order shelter-in-place recommendations in order to prevent infections or necessarily save lives - it was really about flattening the curve to allow for medical capacity.

Thus, it should be a highly localized approach. It's a fine line between being reactionary and precautionary, and I don't envy decision makers at this time. However, some smart motherfuckers have already done some of the math for us:



https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00262/full

These authors propose a gradual release strategy, wherein a large portion of the population is released initially, followed by a period of 1-2 weeks after after the end of an infection peak in community spread before a smaller potion is released back to work, followed by 'second peak' 1-2 months after the initial release (where we could be heading in 1 month), with the remaining population remaining population in quarantine for another 1-2 weeks.

This is essentially what some states have already been doing. Unfortuantely, other states (many of the red states in the top figure), employed an on-off release strategy, which will likely overwhelm their healthcare capacities.

tl;dr: States should pay close attention to the ICU occupancy and employ 1-2 week waiting periods of a gradual release strategy of their populations to make more informed decisions.
Member
Posts: 33,645
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,617.52
Jun 13 2020 06:05pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ Jun 13 2020 05:51pm)
https://i.imgur.com/IxjneZt.jpg

When discussing re-opening/closing down/staying closed, we should pay close attention to hospital and ICU availability. States across the US didn't order shelter-in-place recommendations in order to prevent infections or necessarily save lives - it was really about flattening the curve to allow for medical capacity.

Thus, it should be a highly localized approach. It's a fine line between being reactionary and precautionary, and I don't envy decision makers at this time. However, some smart motherfuckers have already done some of the math for us:

https://i.imgur.com/a5QnLgf.jpg

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00262/full

These authors propose a gradual release strategy, wherein a large portion of the population is released initially, followed by a period of 1-2 weeks after after the end of an infection peak in community spread before a smaller potion is released back to work, followed by 'second peak' 1-2 months after the initial release (where we could be heading in 1 month), with the remaining population remaining population in quarantine for another 1-2 weeks.

This is essentially what some states have already been doing. Unfortuantely, other states (many of the red states in the top figure), employed an on-off release strategy, which will likely overwhelm their healthcare capacities.

tl;dr: States should pay close attention to the ICU occupancy and employ 1-2 week waiting periods of a gradual release strategy of their populations to make more informed decisions.


Suck a fatty, were opening up
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
Jun 14 2020 04:24pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ 13 Jun 2020 18:05)
Suck a fatty, were opening up


It is Boomers, Black people, the immunocompromised, and people with obesity/type 2 diabetes/cardiovascular risk factors that will ultimately have to suck a fatty with these states' on-off strategies. The young, middle-aged, and economy have taken hits over the past 2.5 months to protect these groups.

A gradual release strategy is probably better, but this is one aspect I like about our 50 states: we can see and compare in real-time how different policies and ideas work across the different states.
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 14 2020 05:04pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ Jun 14 2020 05:24pm)
It is Boomers, Black people, the immunocompromised, and people with obesity/type 2 diabetes/cardiovascular risk factors that will ultimately have to suck a fatty with these states' on-off strategies. The young, middle-aged, and economy have taken hits over the past 2.5 months to protect these groups.

A gradual release strategy is probably better, but this is one aspect I like about our 50 states: we can see and compare in real-time how different policies and ideas work across the different states.


The good thing about states is they can act as a laboratory trying different ideas and seeing the results. The bad thing about states is they aren't isolated, so when one place fails and produces a shit load of poor people they travel to well-off states for opportunity and make them look worse as a result. So our states are shitty laboratories lol.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jun 14 2020 05:04pm
Member
Posts: 77,660
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 500.00
Jun 15 2020 09:53am
Edited

This post was edited by duffman316 on Jun 15 2020 09:53am
Member
Posts: 33,663
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
Jun 16 2020 10:00am
Oxford researchers have found the drug dexamethasone reduces Coronavirus deaths. In the trial it reduced death rates by a third for patients on ventilators.

It's cheap, easy to use and could save so many lives across the world.
Member
Posts: 53,338
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jun 16 2020 12:45pm
Quote (dro94 @ 16 Jun 2020 12:00)
Oxford researchers have found the drug dexamethasone reduces Coronavirus deaths. In the trial it reduced death rates by a third for patients on ventilators.

It's cheap, easy to use and could save so many lives across the world.

so it wont get any traction unfortunately
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1544545546547548910Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll