A good and smart article. I wish I could disagree with it, but I cant.

Yeah, yeah. Trump doesn't present well. Not news to anyone.


I have to give the Natl. Review credit at least for admitting the reality of Trump's claims.





Do you think the next interview will be with Obama, about something like... Obamagate? Or maybe they could interview the FBI?

Don't think that's gonna happen.

This post was edited by Ghot on Jul 20 2020 07:19pm

The article hit right on the money though: Trump was given a golden opportunity by the interviewer to tout his achievements, to frame his first term in a positive light and lay out a rationale for why the country should give him a second term. Instead of catching the ball and running with it, he basked in self-pity and offered nothing but backwards-looking resentment.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jul 20 2020 07:20pm

Trump doesn't DO... live. It's just a fact.

Well, I'm sure he CAN do live, just not the kind of live that the American public would like. I mean, you do know that, right? Remember Charlottesville?
Trump's ideas are good, he just doesn't "present" well.

Take Charlottesville... I'm sure what Trump was attempting to say was something like... "Both sides had good points to make, but the result was at best a... disaster. Maybe next time, each side could sit down with ther respective groups and come up with a speaker. Then those speakers could have sat down and each presented their opinions on the subject, and possibly taken... phone calls to see how the American public felt about the issues."


But what Trump came up with in a LIVE setting was: "There's really fine people on both sides". <---- As we all saw, that didn't "play" very well.


Yes, all you said is accurate. The National Review did give Trump the golden opportunity to....
.

Unfortunately... Trump doesn't DO live. It's not one of his talents. IMHO, Trump's major talent is to stick to his guns no matter how the wind is blowing. Every time Trump get caught in the LIVE limelight, he fumbles.
NOT with his ideas or direction... but his lack of ability to handle... LIVE.



IF the Natl. Review had given Trump a list of questions beforehand, and a teleprompter on the set.... we would have had a much better presentation.

This post was edited by Ghot on Jul 20 2020 08:22pm

Chris Wallace is a shameful cowardly lying faggot

Is Obamagate the 680 miles of border fence Obama built?

No. Obamagate is Obama illegally spying, using illegally gotten FISA warrants, based on illegally gotten fake dossiers.

They weren't defending shit. What really pisses me off the most though is that Republicans seem not to give a single fuck about trigger discipline. These monkeys don't know how to use those guns and you people should be utterly embarrassed about it.

Don't you mean US intelligence, all lead and mostly staffed by Republicans, was investigating foreign spies and kept incidentally running into Trump campaign officials at every corner? Because that's what happened. Obama didn't crawl up inside Trump Tower like James Bond and hide in the walls and bug his golden shitter.

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Jul 20 2020 10:35pm

Oh, I get it. When things go bad in Trump's term, it's HIS fault. But when things go bad in Obama's term it's Trump's fault.