the autopsy didnt have an "if not for" section on Fentanyl, it had one for Chauvin.

disagreements aside, do you know what i'm speaking of? do you know what the "if not for" language in the autopsy means?

yes.

I already pointed it out.

so you disagree with the medical examiner?



no, you accused me of lumping Hispanics into one group. i explained i was doing the opposite. you said i should spend some time down south, which makes no sense considering what i said.

perhaps you should read for context more, or slower, likely both.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 7 2021 08:41am

I get that you don't understand it but I'm not in the habit of wasting my time holding hands here.

and you can't disprove a word, just snark.

expected tho. you have too low of an IQ to swim in my pool, im just hanging in the shallows today because i didnt wanna get my balls in the cold water just yet.

but the door is always open for you to try, you wont tho, you're a coward. and not smart enough to do anything but be vague in response to pretty basic facts. its not sad tho, most of us (including "your side") just laugh at you. you're a running joke, not YOU you, people like you. You as a person arent even a blip on the radar, i only remember you you because i have a superb memory. to pard u might as well not have a username, you're just shitposter#1204.

You like most people aren't here to learn or expand. You just want your bias confirmed. Low effort lad, low effort.

Why are you doubling down on stupidity? Is your reading comprehension skills as bad as TiStuff? How is this lumping Hispanics? And, what was the point of the vague South comment?

irony.

i asked you to disprove me, i asked to learn. you said u cant hold my hand and ran off like a little girl.

door's still open samantha.



classic "i cant be asked to try, but i'll post 20 posts in response to you to show you how little i care" behavior.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jul 7 2021 09:01am

of course, the whole trial was rigged.