d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The Mueller Report
Prev15354555657173Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 48,844
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
Apr 2 2019 02:13pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 2 2019 02:50pm)
I have to agree with this.


Who cares?

People in politics will always spin dishonest narratives. That's not a valid argument against transparency.
Member
Posts: 46,667
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Apr 2 2019 02:26pm
Quote (IceMage @ Apr 2 2019 02:13pm)
Who cares?

People in politics will always spin dishonest narratives. That's not a valid argument against transparency.


Quote (IceMage @ Apr 2 2019 02:00pm)
Democrats are acting like an opposing party with oversight responsibilities. Simple as that.


Oh if only you were as dismissive every time Drumpf farts as you are to the 'opposition party' antics the dems are up to now.

Theres a perfectly valid argument against the subpoenas and we just walked through it and you didnt disagree with any of it. Barr is following protocol to the letter and doing everything right, and still dems are trying to abuse their oversight powers to demand an unredacted report today.

Why such disinterest?
Member
Posts: 104,574
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Apr 2 2019 02:26pm






Member
Posts: 48,844
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
Apr 2 2019 03:00pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Apr 2 2019 03:26pm)
Oh if only you were as dismissive every time Drumpf farts as you are to the 'opposition party' antics the dems are up to now.

Theres a perfectly valid argument against the subpoenas and we just walked through it and you didnt disagree with any of it. Barr is following protocol to the letter and doing everything right, and still dems are trying to abuse their oversight powers to demand an unredacted report today.

Why such disinterest?


I'm an outside observer giving my perspective about what the truth is. If the assumption is that everybody involved in Washington is acting in good faith, is reasonable, and thinks transparency is incredibly important in relation to Mueller's findings, I'd criticize the Democrats threatening subpoenas.

But we don't live in that world.
Member
Posts: 53,340
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Apr 2 2019 03:16pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ 2 Apr 2019 15:47)
It's so cute watching you

:unsure: :wacko:

reported, btw
Quote (Surfpunk @ 2 Apr 2019 15:57)
It's also cute watching him ignore context and just go full-bore with his alt-right addled delusions

Actual context:



Usual suspect freaking out in his usual way, that's our excellence.

I clearly stated, in the VERY FIRST POST OF THAT THREAD, that the info at the time had not been fully confirmed, but it was sufficient to warrant an investigation. That investigation happened.

Deal with it.


you demanded a full investigation because you denied the election result and read a dailykos article. and you got one for two years, mueller finished it, and it's still not enough. nothing is ever enough for privileged lefties like yourself and others who want to undo the legal system and protocol because of your emotions. this was already covered already here: http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=80868560&f=119&p=544316036 http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=80868560&f=119&p=544316687 and here: http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=80868560&f=119&p=544429405
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Apr 2 2019 03:27pm
Quote (excellence @ Apr 2 2019 04:16pm)
:unsure: :wacko:

reported, btw


you demanded a full investigation because you denied the election result and read a dailykos article. and you got one for two years, mueller finished it, and it's still not enough. nothing is ever enough for privileged lefties like yourself and others who want to undo the legal system and protocol because of your emotions. this was already covered already here: http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=80868560&f=119&p=544316036 http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=80868560&f=119&p=544316687 and here: http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=80868560&f=119&p=544429405


Like I said, reading comprehension is REALLY FUCKING HARD for you.

Quote (Surfpunk @ Apr 2 2019 10:30am)
On the one hand, Barr did what he was hired to do. On the other hand, he's right with regard to certain parts of the report not being able to be released yet due to ongoing investigations by other parties. My desire to read the report in its entirety doesn't outweigh the need for investigations to be run properly, and not be tainted by public opinion.


And who is denying the election? I didn't vote for that twit Clinton, either.

Plus, as I stated in that OP that I already quoted for you here, but you couldn't be arsed to read, the ONLY REASON I even quoted Kos was because they had a series of Tweets linked in one article, rather than having to post link after link after link to individual Tweets in a single post.

Tard.

Member
Posts: 53,340
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Apr 2 2019 03:36pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ 2 Apr 2019 17:27)
Like I said, reading comprehension is REALLY FUCKING HARD for you.



And who is denying the election? I didn't vote for that twit Clinton, either.

Plus, as I stated in that OP that I already quoted for you here, but you couldn't be arsed to read, the ONLY REASON I even quoted Kos was because they had a series of Tweets linked in one article, rather than having to post link after link after link to individual Tweets in a single post.

Tard.


you are - again you started a 2-year long spam thread dedicated to denying the election and math on the premise that drumpf colluded to hack the election with 'russia' here: http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=76154721&f=119&p=515185534
now that the investigation is done, it's still not good enough. this is shown by your rage-induced temper tantrums (including the post i am replying to) and my response here: http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=80868560&f=119&p=544429405

reported, btw
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Apr 2 2019 03:46pm
Quote (excellence @ Apr 2 2019 04:36pm)
you are - again you started a 2-year long spam thread dedicated to denying the election and math on the premise that drumpf colluded to hack the election with 'russia' here: http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=76154721&f=119&p=515185534
now that the investigation is done, it's still not good enough. this is shown by your rage-induced temper tantrums (including the post i am replying to) and my response here: http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=80868560&f=119&p=544429405

reported, btw


Blah blah blah. Just because you don't like the topic doesn't make it a spam thread.

And you STILL haven't shown where I was wrong about the Mueller Report.
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,296.75
Apr 2 2019 04:38pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Apr 2 2019 12:57pm)
Lmao, what a fan, I'm not sure if I should laugh or feel bad for you.

What exactly was I wrong about? I was proven correct while knowing and caring very little for the intricacies of a nonsensical, politically charged investigation. Why would I be embarrassed?


I'm someone that thinks people should back it up with supporting evidence rather than just go off feelings like you and the other trump/ant-left people do here

If I make a claim about someone it's my obligation to provide examples of what I'm talking about which is what I did in that post

Quote (IceMage @ Mar 22 2019 03:05pm)
Just to be clear on a few things:

- any obstruction by Trump wouldn't be charged, so it would have to be in Mueller's report
- there may be evidence of collusion(like Manafort sharing polling data with a GRU-connected Russian) that Mueller believed didn't meet the threshold for an indictment
- people who believed "no collusion" based on their political feelings, and not the evidence, are not vindicated today. So everybody except Goom can fuck off, ty


as to your bold I will refer you to this post
Member
Posts: 26,267
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 13,770.00
Apr 2 2019 04:44pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Apr 2 2019 03:38pm)
I'm someone that thinks people should back it up with supporting evidence rather than just go off feelings like you and the other trump/ant-left people do here

If I make a claim about someone it's my obligation to provide examples of what I'm talking about which is what I did in that post



as to your bold I will refer you to this post


Are you able to come up with a coherent thought?

I don't need vindication for not caring about something fictional. There were no feelings involved it was simply common sense.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15354555657173Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll