May i remind you that the US spent billions and is literally the reason why Europe was rebuilt post WW2 with the Marshall plan. Even after that, it was the sole reason why the Soviets didn't move past east Germany. Fast forward to today, Europe has no navy and wouldn't even be able to protect its water ways. Without the US, Houthis can effectively shut down all trade through red sea as they wish, while other trade in the Mediterranean, or around Africa would also come under threat of piracy. We continually overspend and over contribute to NATO while Europe severally underspends for decades.
So in the grand scheme of things, if you are so upset over tariffs (which with Europe, Japan, SK are clearly designed for negotiation) that you get amnesia of the historical realities i highlighted, well, Europe can hardly be labeled an ally, more so a parasite.
The Marshall Plan was enacted to stop the spread of communism that the US feared was an existential threat to western democracy. It was done to serve your interests. Of course, Europe would have always rebuilt without it, considering its pool of high quality human capital. In more recent history, we also spent billions in Iraq and Afghanistan, blindly following your efforts to police to world.
If the tariffs were just designed for negotiation, you'd threaten them to get your partners to the negotiating table, rather than applying the tariffs first. Allies would talk about it first, but there were no such trade talks preceding the 'liberation day' tariff announcements.
Many European countries have been spending over 2% of GDP on defence for decades. Deficiencies in military capability are just as much a result of the inefficiencies of having 27 separate member state armies as certain countries not pulling their weight (Germany, Spain, etc...).
This post was edited by dro94 on Apr 12 2025 03:16pm