Quote (Black XistenZ @ Dec 3 2020 02:44pm)
The more I think about it, the more stupid I think your outlook on all of this is. Considering these possibilities to have always been out of the question, even back in February/March/April, is itself a stupid opinion.
You're using generalities like "justified to have hope" and "on the broader issue" to avoid the real issue, which is that Trump never gave any indication at any stage of his candidacy or his presidency that he would appropriately handle a real emergency. He has always been fundamentally disinterested in governing and this was apparent the entire time.
When you say he "outsourced" you mean he ignored them. To call it "outsourcing" is a supremely dishonest framing. He hasn't been "outsourcing" to professionals, he's been letting Kushner handle things he doesn't care about, which is virtually all governing.
Anyway, I'm bored with this. It's obvious to pretty much everybody who wasn't on the Trump train that he was never going to respond appropriately to a real emergency because he has never, ever, ever, ever, shown any interest in actual governing, and it's easy to see the pattern.
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Dec 3 2020 03:15pm)
Eh, I dont think that they would go along if Trump came out in support of things like BLM, amnesty or a hefty carbon tax. The reason why his base stuck with him through all the scandals and fumbles is that he stayed where the base was, always tried to give the base what it wants.
More dishonest framing.
Trump says everything at once, and his base cherry picks what they want to hear and ignore everything else.
This post was edited by Thor123422 on Dec 3 2020 03:23pm