d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearing Week
Prev15152535455443Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Sep 17 2018 10:04pm
Quote (krackprophet @ Sep 18 2018 12:01am)
So, what did the others say? This statement tries to infer that half dropped their support without saying it.


the others mustn't have said they stood by him still? or else the author of that tweet would've said more than TWO still stood by him?

lol...

was that so hard?
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Sep 17 2018 10:06pm
just to be clear, I don't think anything I just posted will prevent Kavanaugh from getting in, but I hope as hell the democrats make it as difficult as possible as Trump should only have 1 SCOTUS nomination so far, not two.
Member
Posts: 2,660
Joined: Mar 28 2010
Gold: 0.00
Sep 17 2018 10:08pm
Quote (Horford @ Sep 17 2018 10:04pm)
the others mustn't have said they stood by him still? or else the author of that tweet would've said more than TWO still stood by him?

lol...

was that so hard?


https://twitter.com/dlippman/status/1041762002882899970

Quote
More
Five of the 65 women who signed last week’s pro-Kavanaugh letter have now reaffirmed their support publicly or directly to @politico reporters, who have tried to reach out to all signers. Update here:


Trash journalism at its finest.
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Sep 17 2018 10:10pm
Quote (krackprophet @ Sep 18 2018 12:08am)
[URL=https://twitter.com/dlippman/status/1041762002882899970]https://twitter.com/dlippman/status/1041762002882899970[/URL]



Trash journalism at its finest.


5 out of 65? wow, that's some strong support right there!
Member
Posts: 2,660
Joined: Mar 28 2010
Gold: 0.00
Sep 17 2018 10:19pm
Quote (Horford @ Sep 17 2018 10:10pm)
5 out of 65? wow, that's some strong support right there!


Did you actually read the article? Nowhere in it did it even mention any of the women retracting their support. Trash journalism.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/16/trump-kavanaugh-allegations-response-826069
Member
Posts: 53,338
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Sep 17 2018 10:22pm
Quote (krackprophet @ 18 Sep 2018 00:01)
So, what did the others say? This statement tries to infer that half dropped their support without saying it.

all that says is some guys ‘andrew restuccia and daniel lippman’ berated/did some unsolicited calls to a group of women, and most of them nonverbally communicated to those two little fellas to go away
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Sep 17 2018 10:42pm
Quote (excellence @ Sep 18 2018 12:22am)
all that says is some guys ‘andrew restuccia and daniel lippman’ berated/did some unsolicited calls to a group of women, and most of them nonverbally communicated to those two little fellas to go away


Lol

Quote (krackprophet @ Sep 18 2018 12:19am)
Did you actually read the article? Nowhere in it did it even mention any of the women retracting their support. Trash journalism.

[URL=https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/16/trump-kavanaugh-allegations-response-826069]https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/16/trump-kavanaugh-allegations-response-826069[/URL]


No where did i state any of those 65 women were "retracting their support", i just pointed out only a handful were willing to double down their support. Anyways, i didn't read the article and see post #522.

Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Sep 17 2018 10:54pm
Just watched a reporter chase down Susan Collins in an airport asking whether she believes the accuser. Man she is rattled. Goodincellencememe.gif
Member
Posts: 46,664
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 22,164.69
Sep 18 2018 01:52am
Quote (Horford @ Sep 17 2018 09:58pm)
Remember those 65 women that defended Kavanaugh?

Daniel Lippman
‏Verified account @dlippman

.@AndrewRestuccia and I called many of Kavanaugh's 65 female HS acquittances who signed a letter supporting him. After his accuser came out on Sunday, only TWO said they still stood by him. More than two dozen didn't respond, and two declined to comment.


so two complete nobodies from politico tried to call up the women and got ignored and then made their report insinuating that their inability to report implies the women retracted their support
This is a recurring theme I've noticed in the most desperate circles of journalism, where reporters make their story about how they were unable to even contact the people who clearly brushed them off, as if that meant anything beyond them being a totally worthless reporter who can't even get a phone call. Its not the first time I've commented on that same phenomenon, but I can't remember what some of the previous ones have been, its not exactly notable. The entire professional ability of a journalist relies upon their access to people and getting them to talk, and apparently "Daniel Lippman" had less success than I would have if I just randomly started calling up women on that list and asking them for comment, because 2/65 is fucking pathetic
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15152535455443Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll