By Stating that something came from nothing only goes to show your complete lack of knowledge of the most simple concepts of the big bang and of science in general. This brings into question the validity of anything else you have stated in my eyes. To be clear i am not a christian, nor do i follow any religion other then christianity.

Any valid arguments so far?

Answer: NO!!!

(And then they wonder why people make fun of them - lol)

Actually, arabic numerals are descended from the hindu-arabic numeral system. Its called hindu-arabic because it was created by indian matematicians and adopted by the persians. In other words, its not at all created by arabs. The reason we still refer to them as arabic is because they were introduced in europe by arabs and people didnt know their actual origin. The arabs themselves refered to them as hindu numerals. We even call digits by their hindu names although they've been slightly altered by time and translation. More strawmen please.

i doubt he'll respond directly to this

He'll actually just deny it because he thinks there's something cool going on with his hands.

That...just reinforces what we've been saying. It says right in your link the Arabs used 0-9 until around 900~1000. Not to mention the numbers came from India.

Are you illiterate?

Can you answer any of my posts?

Basically, in your previous response to Sylvannos you claimed that arabic numerals predates the hindu numerals, trying to correct him when he claimed the opposite. Instead of just admitting that you're wrong you increase text size and quote a source that itself says that arabic numerals are originating (even directly translated from) hindu numerals that were created by indian matematicians centuries before their arabic counterpart. Your quote even says so. "However they [indian numerals] were not transmitted directly from India to Europe but rather came first to the Arabic/Islamic peoples and from them to Europe." While the quote is true, all it does is prove our point. Why not just admit that you were wrong about this?

While it may seem like its completely off topic, it's actually speaks volumes of how you ignore any argument that falsifies your claim. Anyway, lets drop the numerals.

Here's a question I'd like you to answer. What is proof to you?