d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Election Day Megathread
Prev1518519520521522534Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 92,959
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Dec 3 2020 09:58am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Dec 3 2020 09:45am)
Good prediction, although it wasnt exactly a difficult one to make. Trump had spent almost the entire campaign season laying the groundwork for this maneuver which allows him to keep his image as a "winner" in spite of losing the election, thus saving face with his base.


i thought trump would win, based on results in states that turned out to be nail biters.

the reaction stuff tho, 100%, trump voters are proven whiners.
Member
Posts: 54,106
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Dec 3 2020 10:34am
Quote (IceMage @ 3 Dec 2020 16:57)
I think for someone from my perspective, it's not a difficult or surprising prediction. We know the utter rot of Trump, his cult, the right-wing, and the Republican party. But it's a little strange to see a Trump supporter saying it's not a difficult prediction.


I expected him (and the GOP) to lose by a bigger margin to be honest.

Perhaps it's because I was an avid supporter, but never an actual "cultist" (no matter how many times PaRD's lefties called me out as one).
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 3 2020 10:37am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Dec 3 2020 10:34am)
I expected him (and the GOP) to lose by a bigger margin to be honest.

Perhaps it's because I was an avid supporter, but never an actual "cultist" (no matter how many times PaRD's lefties called me out as one).


You ride the cultist line.

You dropped it at the pandemic, but it shouldnt have taken the world diving off a cliff to make a realization. Like, some foresight would have allowed you to drop the avid support earlier as you realize we dont get to pick the dates of emergencies.
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Dec 3 2020 10:42am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 3 Dec 2020 11:34)
I expected him (and the GOP) to lose by a bigger margin to be honest.

Perhaps it's because I was an avid supporter, but never an actual "cultist" (no matter how many times PaRD's lefties called me out as one).

the anti-american, russia-obsessed klan calling everyone else cultists has been quite the laugh

this group consists of useful pawns for foreign adversaries, nothing more. its no surprise they voted for the harris/biden ticket https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-55168633

between this, jacking up tax rates on working and middle-class, and undoing peace deals in the middle east, it’ll be right back to the establishment status quo of selling out america and americans for the interests of the cocktail-partying politicians, armaments companies, and foreign governments/global oligarchies masquerading as helpful organizations

This post was edited by excellence on Dec 3 2020 10:44am
Member
Posts: 54,106
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Dec 3 2020 10:45am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 3 Dec 2020 17:37)
You ride the cultist line.

You dropped it at the pandemic, but it shouldnt have taken the world diving off a cliff to make a realization. Like, some foresight would have allowed you to drop the avid support earlier as you realize we dont get to pick the dates of emergencies.


Well... I still believed for the longest time that if shit would really hit the fan, Trump would be able to get his shit together and perform on at least the replacement level. Imho, claiming that this hope was unfounded all along is hindsight bias. We couldnt really have known if Trump would be able to be a bit more serious and professional in the face of a serious crisis. Now we know that he didnt have it in him, and he consequently lost his (eminently winnable) reelection race because of this failure.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Dec 3 2020 10:50am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Dec 3 2020 10:45am)
Well... I still believed for the longest time that if shit would really hit the fan, Trump would be able to get his shit together and perform on at least the replacement level. Imho, claiming that this hope was unfounded all along is hindsight bias. We couldnt really have known if Trump would be able to be a bit more serious and professional in the face of a serious crisis. Now we know that he didnt have it in him, and he consequently lost his (eminently winnable) reelection race because of this failure.


I'll agree that had Trump been able to offer up even a serviceable response to the pandemic, he would have had a pretty easy reelection.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 3 2020 10:51am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Dec 3 2020 10:45am)
Well... I still believed for the longest time that if shit would really hit the fan, Trump would be able to get his shit together and perform on at least the replacement level. Imho, claiming that this hope was unfounded all along is hindsight bias. We couldnt really have known if Trump would be able to be a bit more serious and professional in the face of a serious crisis. Now we know that he didnt have it in him, and he consequently lost his (eminently winnable) reelection race because of this failure.


We had every reason to know that wasnt what would happen. If somebody doesnt get serious when they assume THE MOST POWERFUL OFFICE IN THE WORLD you are being genuinely stupid if you think they ever will.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Dec 3 2020 10:51am
Member
Posts: 54,106
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Dec 3 2020 02:02pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 3 Dec 2020 17:51)
We had every reason to know that wasnt what would happen. If somebody doesnt get serious when they assume THE MOST POWERFUL OFFICE IN THE WORLD you are being genuinely stupid if you think they ever will.


Oh, I dont think that Trump has been unserious in this sense throughout his time in office. With "get serious", I meant something along the lines of "thinking about his communication with the public rather than shooting from the hip" or "putting aside his ego for just a single moment". But fine, consider me stupid for having a different opinion on Trump than you do if it makes you feel elated.

What is it with liberals and their pervasive urge to call anyone who disagrees with them either stupid, uninformed or immoral? :rolleyes:



Side note: the most powerful office in the world is that of paramount leader of China (chairman of the CCP, supreme commander of the PLA and president of the PRC). The U.S. are still the more powerful nation than China, but the Chinese leader enjoys a far greater amount of power and authority in his country while the power of U.S. presidents is limited by a strong separation of powers, a free press and the need to win free elections.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Dec 3 2020 02:04pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Dec 3 2020 02:11pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Dec 3 2020 02:02pm)
Oh, I dont think that Trump has been unserious in this sense throughout his time in office. With "get serious", I meant something along the lines of "thinking about his communication with the public rather than shooting from the hip" or "putting aside his ego for just a single moment". But fine, consider me stupid for having a different opinion on Trump than you do if it makes you feel elated.

What is it with liberals and their pervasive urge to call anyone who disagrees with them either stupid, uninformed or immoral? :rolleyes:

Side note: the most powerful office in the world is that of paramount leader of China (chairman of the CCP, supreme commander of the PLA and president of the PRC). The U.S. are still the more powerful nation than China, but the Chinese leader enjoys a far greater amount of power and authority in his country while the power of U.S. presidents is limited by a strong separation of powers, a free press and the need to win free elections.


I think when it comes to evaluating Trump, you are very stupid. There's probably things that you are smart and can think critically about, but politics generally isn't one of them, with Trump being an extreme example of this deficit. The reason I say that is because of your inability to see patterns and project that behavior into the future on this subject. Trump was never going to listen to experts, was never going to take an actual emergency seriously, and was never going to put aside his ego, and we had years of data to draw this conclusion from. This is how conservatives have treated him from day one, where all his negative actions were isolated and definitely not part of a larger pattern. And you only broke from this when he failed to do anything about a literal pandemic.
Member
Posts: 54,106
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Dec 3 2020 02:25pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 3 Dec 2020 21:11)
I think when it comes to evaluating Trump, you are very stupid. There's probably things that you are smart and can think critically about, but politics generally isn't one of them, with Trump being an extreme example of this deficit. The reason I say that is because of your inability to see patterns and project that behavior into the future on this subject. Trump was never going to listen to experts, was never going to take an actual emergency seriously, and was never going to put aside his ego, and we had years of data to draw this conclusion from. This is how conservatives have treated him from day one, where all his negative actions were isolated and definitely not part of a larger pattern. And you only broke from this when he failed to do anything about a literal pandemic.


There are ample issues on which liberals, yourself included, are completely blind and oblivious to glaring patterns, to obvious future developments, and often times to human nature itself. You might be right or wrong in your assessment of me, but you are definitely, 100% mistaken when it comes to the high horse you're think you're sitting on.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1518519520521522534Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll