d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > The Duffington Post > Bringing You Real News
Prev1516517518519520587Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 50,719
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
Nov 8 2023 12:31am
Quote (Sioux @ Nov 7 2023 11:50pm)
Gotta go to history vs Hollywood to get the real story


Its a copy of the Armstrong Report, made all the way back in 2002 and from the eponymous Knapp Commission chief counsel and completed in 2003. The PDF has been out there for 20 years for anyone willing to read it
the basic gist is there's plenty of verifiable evidence Yusef Salaam and the other 4 did indeed beat and molest Trisha Meili (and a whole list of other people that same night), who was then subsequently attacked by another rapist, and they got convicted on a wrong theory of the crime for the whole of her injuries because police had no way to know about the second attack on her. Which isn't to say they were wrongly convicted, because arguably they hold culpability for leaving her for dead in the first place and the foreseeable attack by Reyes, particularly if he had actually joined them or been seen by them.

best case scenario is that new york just elected a guy who spent his teenage years violently assaulting random people for shits and giggles and never showed any remorse
Member
Posts: 26,862
Joined: Feb 27 2013
Gold: 4,445.68
Nov 8 2023 12:43am
Duffman manifesting Jan 6th into existence is wild. Someone needs to study this man
Member
Posts: 50,719
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 4,861.00
Nov 9 2023 08:42am
Spanish conservative-populist Vox party (#3 largest party in spain) founder Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca was just assassinated in Madrid by a gunman on a motorcycle
This comes as he was going to protest against the spanish government giving amnesty to catalan separatists
Member
Posts: 28,976
Joined: Jun 20 2007
Gold: 34.51
Nov 16 2023 03:20pm
Farmer's thumbs-up emoji reply to texted contract offer means he accepted it, must pay $82,000: judge

"'I did not have time to review the Flax Contract and merely wanted to indicate that I did receive his text message,' the Saskatchewan farmer argued"

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/farmer-ordered-to-pay-after-judge-says-thumbs-up-emoji-amounts-to-contract-acceptance

Court Decision

In court, Achter Ltd. argued that there was no binding contract because Mr. Achter’s “👍” emoji merely acknowledged receipt of the contract and didn’t confirm acceptance.

The court disagreed with this argument. Instead, it looked at the parties’ past communications when they had discussed grain sales. In previous interactions, they had understood Mr. Achter’s brief replies as acceptance of the contract, not just acknowledgment of receipt. To determine if a contract was formed, the court assessed how a reasonable person, aware of their past dealings, would interpret the “👍” emoji. In this context, the court found that a reasonable person would see it as an agreement, similar to their previous agreements.

Additionally, the court considered whether the “👍” emoji met the requirements under Saskatchewan’s Sale of Goods Act, which says that for a contract for sale of goods over $50 to be legally binding, it must either be partially performed (goods partially delivered or payment partially made), or the parties must sign their acceptance of the written contract. The court concluded that the “👍” emoji effectively acted as Mr. Achter’s signature—similar to electronic signatures or clicking an “I Agree” button on an electronic document, which are accepted ways to sign contracts.

Takeaway

This case highlights the importance of using well-drafted and properly signed contracts. If South West had insisted on Mr. Achter signing a physical contract for the flax seed delivery at $17 per bushel, this case likely wouldn’t have gone to court, as Mr. Achter wouldn’t have had a valid defense.

At the same time, the case shows that parties usually can’t evade their contractual obligations by relying on questionable “loopholes” that go against the essence of the agreement. Typically, these attempts won’t hold up in court.

This post was edited by SBD on Nov 16 2023 03:21pm
Member
Posts: 9,112
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Nov 17 2023 06:25am
Quote (SBD @ Nov 16 2023 03:20pm)
Farmer's thumbs-up emoji reply to texted contract offer means he accepted it, must pay $82,000: judge

"'I did not have time to review the Flax Contract and merely wanted to indicate that I did receive his text message,' the Saskatchewan farmer argued"

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/farmer-ordered-to-pay-after-judge-says-thumbs-up-emoji-amounts-to-contract-acceptance

Court Decision

In court, Achter Ltd. argued that there was no binding contract because Mr. Achter’s “👍” emoji merely acknowledged receipt of the contract and didn’t confirm acceptance.

The court disagreed with this argument. Instead, it looked at the parties’ past communications when they had discussed grain sales. In previous interactions, they had understood Mr. Achter’s brief replies as acceptance of the contract, not just acknowledgment of receipt. To determine if a contract was formed, the court assessed how a reasonable person, aware of their past dealings, would interpret the “👍” emoji. In this context, the court found that a reasonable person would see it as an agreement, similar to their previous agreements.

Additionally, the court considered whether the “👍” emoji met the requirements under Saskatchewan’s Sale of Goods Act, which says that for a contract for sale of goods over $50 to be legally binding, it must either be partially performed (goods partially delivered or payment partially made), or the parties must sign their acceptance of the written contract. The court concluded that the “👍” emoji effectively acted as Mr. Achter’s signature—similar to electronic signatures or clicking an “I Agree” button on an electronic document, which are accepted ways to sign contracts.

Takeaway

This case highlights the importance of using well-drafted and properly signed contracts. If South West had insisted on Mr. Achter signing a physical contract for the flax seed delivery at $17 per bushel, this case likely wouldn’t have gone to court, as Mr. Achter wouldn’t have had a valid defense.

At the same time, the case shows that parties usually can’t evade their contractual obligations by relying on questionable “loopholes” that go against the essence of the agreement. Typically, these attempts won’t hold up in court.


ROFL

Guess it's time to blast contractual agreements and wait for emoji binding thumbs.
Member
Posts: 7,251
Joined: Oct 9 2021
Gold: 4,661.71
Nov 17 2023 06:27am
Quote (SBD @ Nov 16 2023 10:20pm)
Farmer's thumbs-up emoji reply to texted contract offer means he accepted it, must pay $82,000: judge

"'I did not have time to review the Flax Contract and merely wanted to indicate that I did receive his text message,' the Saskatchewan farmer argued"

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/farmer-ordered-to-pay-after-judge-says-thumbs-up-emoji-amounts-to-contract-acceptance

Court Decision

In court, Achter Ltd. argued that there was no binding contract because Mr. Achter’s “👍” emoji merely acknowledged receipt of the contract and didn’t confirm acceptance.

The court disagreed with this argument. Instead, it looked at the parties’ past communications when they had discussed grain sales. In previous interactions, they had understood Mr. Achter’s brief replies as acceptance of the contract, not just acknowledgment of receipt. To determine if a contract was formed, the court assessed how a reasonable person, aware of their past dealings, would interpret the “👍” emoji. In this context, the court found that a reasonable person would see it as an agreement, similar to their previous agreements.

Additionally, the court considered whether the “👍” emoji met the requirements under Saskatchewan’s Sale of Goods Act, which says that for a contract for sale of goods over $50 to be legally binding, it must either be partially performed (goods partially delivered or payment partially made), or the parties must sign their acceptance of the written contract. The court concluded that the “👍” emoji effectively acted as Mr. Achter’s signature—similar to electronic signatures or clicking an “I Agree” button on an electronic document, which are accepted ways to sign contracts.

Takeaway

This case highlights the importance of using well-drafted and properly signed contracts. If South West had insisted on Mr. Achter signing a physical contract for the flax seed delivery at $17 per bushel, this case likely wouldn’t have gone to court, as Mr. Achter wouldn’t have had a valid defense.

At the same time, the case shows that parties usually can’t evade their contractual obligations by relying on questionable “loopholes” that go against the essence of the agreement. Typically, these attempts won’t hold up in court.


Wouldnt be possible in my country.

Nothing properly signed means its not a legal contract here. Simple and effective.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Nov 20 2023 08:43pm
its 2023 and young liberals are supporting osama bin laden
Member
Posts: 56,920
Joined: Nov 7 2009
Gold: 2,195.68
Nov 21 2023 08:37am
Quote (duffman316 @ Nov 20 2023 09:43pm)
its 2023 and young liberals are supporting osama bin laden
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HB6I67ryKjA


saw some news mentioning this so I went and read the letter since I was curious. I'm impressed that there's people out there who read it and don't think he's deranged

This post was edited by Jupe on Nov 21 2023 08:38am
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Dec 21 2023 04:18pm
Right wing extremists kill a black man in cold blood while praising their gods. Hopefully BLM will have something to say about this.

https://twitter.com/JMakamba/status/1735188462528290932
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
Dec 24 2023 10:53pm
celebrate multiculturalism, diversity and inclusion
import a substantial number of muslim immigrants resulting in demographic changes
all male majority muslim city elected
pikachu face when lgbtq imagery is banned by the city

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/17/hamtramck-michigan-muslim-council-lgbtq-pride-flags-banned

In 2015, many liberal residents in Hamtramck, Michigan, celebrated as their city attracted international attention for becoming the first in the United States to elect a Muslim-majority city council.

They viewed the power shift and diversity as a symbolic but meaningful rebuke of the Islamophobic rhetoric that was a central theme of then Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s campaign.

This week many of those same residents watched in dismay as a now fully Muslim and socially conservative city council passed legislation banning Pride flags from being flown on city property that had – like many others being flown around the country – been intended to celebrate the LGBTQ+ community.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1516517518519520587Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll