I think the puns are the most important part.

he doesn’t understand inflation so there’s no chance of a debate. that user calls others “dumb”, but he didnt finish the school he bragged to strangers on the internet about, and has been a state subsidy leech most if not all of his sad little small-time inferiority complex-filled existence

inb4 that users typical repressed frustrated homophobic retort

as usually you spill over with claim after claim never delivering. maybe what you do would work better if you had the fake news people working with you.

Nancy Pelosi explains the wrap-up smear tactic to the press
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mpYc8mjXO0B1/

My fan club grows.

Don't worry guys, I submitted a request to God to respec my charisma points. I don't know how long it will take, but you will be able to control your obsession with me soon enough!

but weirdly enough when I submitted the request, the form just showed up in my mailbox the next day. Wonder what that's all about.

And when fallacy doesn't work you just resort to infantile tactics like this. You're creating your own enemies.

What specific fallacy did I use?

remember the old saying "if you cant dazzle them with brilliance baffle them with bullchit"

or bamboozle them?

Wretched: An atheist professor converts to Christianity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3jrcP-o6Vs

If you're truly an honest person you could look through your post history and out yourself.

he doent know fallacies. basically rides the subjective reasoning train

In other words, you can't identify a fallacy I made but you're trying to save face.

Like I said, you're going to have to grow 40 IQ points before you can ever claim to be debating.