I posted direct quotes, you didn't like the conclusions of the review and downplay it. What else is new?

Tens of millions of dollars and 3+ years of investigation and all you got is a bunch of financial crimes, process crimes, and things like Manafort failing to register as a foreign actor for Ukraine, basically shit that has nothing to do with Russia collision oh and a partisan impeachment which literally broke down by party lines. If there was any shred of actual evidence linking Trump to this you would have had republicans break rank. It was a political investigation and it broke down on political lines when the chips settled. Some of us knew this 4 years ago while you still continue to have issues with accepting this reality today despite the outcome.

Uhhh... no? You posted information that didn't back up your claims, and I pointed it out.

Now you're stating bumper sticker lines that you've believed in for years without evidence... what am I supposed to do with that? If you make a specific claim against an actual fact I can work with that... otherwise you're just talking to yourself.

Weird. Seems that information he posted included the link to the original source, as this continued he continued as well as myself to point out that you are creating a bias conclusion by omitting information in order to form that conclusion. You cannot win, because your results were purposefully skewed by your interference in a fair, free, unbiased investigation .

You are entirely irrelevant at this point.

Judge Bibas was appointed by Trump.

Throughout Trump's presidency, the courts are one of the only institutions that have performed well. Whether it's Trump's criminal friends bringing Fox News talking points as a defense, or this election stuff, judges consistently bat the nonsense down. It's one of the few happy stories of the last 4 years.

This post was edited by IceMage on Nov 27 2020 02:42pm

Ah, you're still playing the Republican vs Democrat game... Lmk when you get to Democracy vs Freedom. Hint: You'll have to actually do something and follow the money, or I guess you could just sit around at watch it all unfold.

FYI: Prior to the SCOTUS decision in Bush v. Gore, every federal court and every state supreme court had ruled for Gore over Bush every time until SCOTUS. Election contests only start next week, and the key procedural aspect of Bush v. Gore was it started as an election contest.

You say a lot of words, but they are void of meaning. Jere you are nuts.

Theres no controversy here.

In Bush v Gore there was a genuine issue to solve. Theres literally nothing to adjudicate here.

You would think these nut jobs would listen to the REPUBLICAN judges that TRUMP APPOINTED. The cult of trump.

Out of curiosity, how do you envision Trump's path victory with margins in the tens of thousands for each key states? This isn't Bush v Gore where it was like 1000 votes in one state. Do you have any conclusive video that support your conspiracy at all. I'm still waiting. You guys love selective circumstancial evidence but you never ever show any direct proof. It reminds me of black men getting incarcerated for 10+ years and subsequently due to improvements in DNA technology, they were set free after the DNA evidence corroborates with their defense. 3 weeks in and still nothing to show for aside from affidavits and Facebook memes.