Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jul 8 2020 01:53pm)
Trump is definitely to blame for having turned mask-wearing into a partisan issue, another battlefront of the culture wars.
I do not, however, believe in the idea that mask-usage is the lone factor that would have made the difference between the United States' current case numbers (~50k) and numbers similar to those in the EU (~5k for a country of the size of the U.S.).
I mean... less than 4 months ago, the WHO, the CDC and most health experts around the Western world were explicitly telling people NOT to use masks because they "are rather ineffectual and would encourage more risky behavior by giving a false sense of security".
Yes, experts always knew that mask wearing would have some mitigating effect on transmission via droplets. But back then, there was still an ongoing debate among health experts whether masks would be a net positive at all, and if yes, it was expected that the effect would only be small-ish. And now, masks are suddenly supposed to be the golden bullet that makes aaaall the difference? Come on! The more convincing explanation is that liberals and the media are playing up the mask issue right now because it is the shortcoming that they can most directly and undeniably blame on Trump.
It's morbidly amusing to me this sort of Trump defense.
The concession is there. Trump failed at doing the very basic aspect of leadership that any other person running in 2016, be it Clinton, Sanders, Cruz, or Rubio, would've done as president. We could've elected a teenager and they would've been able to do the obvious thing of encouraging Americans to wear masks.
Trump fails at these very basic things... we can't even get to larger issues because we're left debating the insanity of a president not promoting safe procedures during a once in a 100 year pandemic. We're stuck looking at Trump retweet stuff about firing one of his experts on pandemics.
Then we move on to how Trump's complete failure actually doesn't matter that much, because *reasons*.
It's insanity.