Quote (fender @ Jan 30 2021 02:27am)
it's the claim YOU made. acting like demanding proof for such an allegation was somehow unreasonable, is silly. and acting like what you provided was proof, just not 'literal' or 'explicit' one is dishonest. the real situation doesn't even remotely fit your accusations.
if you were really so dumb that you couldn't distinguish between insisting on a company fulfilling their contractual obligation, in this case using facilities that the EU invested money in to produce vaccines it ordered, and "demanding UK vaccine supplies", i'd be seriously worried. i have a feeling you can though, and just don't want to admit that you lied in order to make the EU look worse (as if there weren't plenty of legitimate issues to criticise them for).
your idiotic, "daily mail"-worthy, fearmongering, one-sided mischaracterisation of the issue is shameful. it's amazing how american you are in your jingoistic ignorance, lol.
This whole thing reeks of EU doing a poor job on the contracts they signed, EU should have understood they're dealing with big pharma, their only real interest is money, shareholders, bonuses for the upper management and growth.
Everything in that contract should be nailed down without any holes that give these shit companies even the slightest room to wiggle. In the case of EU, the politically correct SJW puppets that signed the contracts seem to have fucked up and now you're getting ass-raped by big pharma who really don't give a shit.
Pwned buddy, next time sent some real men to negotiate the contract, lol