d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2020 > Trump Vs. Pack O' Dems
Prev1509510511512513983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Jul 8 2020 10:43am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jul 8 2020 12:14pm)
Amazing you got all that out of reposting a 22 second out of context clip from media matters, a far-left hit job organization.

The idea that Trump and Tucker are the most extreme and nutty is a statement detached from reality.

Tucker is an important and often well-reasoned voice and a very significant improvement on the stereotypical fox news host and cable TV news hosts in general.

But hey you didnt like an apparent implication in one statement in a clip so lets pretend the entire rightwing is rotten now and ally ourselves with radical leftists and the Jennifer Rubins of the world. Yikes.


I mean extreme and nutty among relevant actors politically... obviously people like yourself and others are more extreme ideologically, but you have no relevance politically, other than to lick the boots of Trump and his cult.

Quote (fender @ Jul 8 2020 12:23pm)
simple question: did tucker carlson consistently rail against masks, social distancing, and other measures that helped most developed countries deal with covid-19 much more successfully than the US did, or did he not?

stop playing your stupid and cowardly game of hiding behind hypotheticals - have a concrete position for once that is open to criticism. constantly defending the science-denying right wing, and then resorting to a flimsy 'well i didn't explicitly say i agree, so you can't possibly attack me for defending them' is boring.


The funny thing is that Tucker was all about masks back when officials were telling Americans not to buy them.

https://twitter.com/bad_takes/status/1280662317139742722

He's just a stupid contrarian.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
Jul 8 2020 10:54am
Quote (IceMage @ Jul 8 2020 12:43pm)
I mean extreme and nutty among relevant actors politically... obviously people like yourself and others are more extreme ideologically, but you have no relevance politically, other than to lick the boots of Trump and his cult.



This eunuch can't defend his positions so he resorts to pretending libertarians lick Trump's boots. Pathetic.
Pointing out you are wrong isn't bootlicking.

An actual bootlicker calling other people bootlickers is amusing.
You love big government and the swamp.
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Jul 8 2020 10:57am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jul 8 2020 12:54pm)
This eunuch can't defend his positions so he resorts to pretending libertarians lick Trump's boots. Pathetic.
Pointing out you are wrong isn't bootlicking.

An actual bootlicker calling other people bootlickers is amusing.
You love big government and the swamp.


I clarified my position while amusing myself by triggering you, and you didn't provide any substantive argument against my post.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 8 2020 10:58am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jul 8 2020 11:54am)
This eunuch can't defend his positions so he resorts to pretending libertarians lick Trump's boots. Pathetic.
Pointing out you are wrong isn't bootlicking.

An actual bootlicker calling other people bootlickers is amusing.
You love big government and the swamp.


100% of your conversations
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Jul 8 2020 11:05am
Quote (cambovenzi @ 8 Jul 2020 18:42)
Loaded question that isn't pertinent to my statements.

I don't watch all of Carlson's shows but i'm pretty sure the answer is no.




I have tons of concrete positions.
The fact that you are completely inept at criticizing them is not a fault of my own.
Nor is choosing to not have the beliefs you desperately want me to have so you can feel better about falsely demonizing people who disagree with you.


i'm sure a person who considers themselves intelligent would be able to get the gist of tucker's messaging without 'watching all of his shows'. see, that's what i meant with your usual cowardice. also, i already acknowledged that you constantly act like your own position is irrelevant as you're, without exception, taking the side of science-denial and authoritarianism. all i'm saying is that it's an exercise in futility, as everyone has long identified you as just another trump boot licker, who desperately tries to give themselves legitimacy and deniability by quoting moronic one-liners from libertarian edgelord forums.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
Jul 8 2020 11:19am
Quote (fender @ Jul 8 2020 01:05pm)
i'm sure a person who considers themselves intelligent would be able to get the gist of tucker's messaging without 'watching all of his shows'. see, that's what i meant with your usual cowardice. also, i already acknowledged that you constantly act like your own position is irrelevant as you're, without exception, taking the side of science-denial and authoritarianism. all i'm saying is that it's an exercise in futility, as everyone has long identified you as just another trump boot licker, who desperately tries to give themselves legitimacy and deniability by quoting moronic one-liners from libertarian edgelord forums.


You asked if he consistently railed against "masks, social distancing, and other measures"
What we have here is a short out of context clip, not a consistent pattern.
There is no cowardice on my part by honestly answering the question. Only intellectual cowardice on yours.

Whether he does or does not is irrelevant to my previous points.

Choosing to label people who disagree with you 'science-deniers and authoritarians' and then pretending a radical libertarian always takes their side is a rather impressive mountain of dishonest delusions.

You are the worst of the dishonest losers who pretend people are bootlickers and evil for disagreeing with you and leftism.
You should try to be more honest and intellectual and actually consider and respond to points on merit.

The idea that years and years of consistently advocating libertarianism is just some ruse so I can have 'deniability' is so insane its pretty funny.

People here like yourself often fall into this trap of low IQ binary thinking.
Either you agree with leftists and all criticism of Trump or you must be a bootlicker for Trump.
In reality leftists and critics of Trump can be and often are wrong and people who disagree with you are not necessarily Trump supporters or bootlickers.
I support liberty and truth.

You dislike that I combat leftist activism and responded emotionally.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jul 8 2020 11:32am
Member
Posts: 33,924
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jul 8 2020 11:35am
Daily reminder

Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 8 2020 11:37am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jul 8 2020 12:19pm)
You asked if he consistently railed against "masks, social distancing, and other measures"
What we have here is a short out of context clip, not a consistent pattern.
There is no cowardice on my part by honestly answering the question. Only intellectual cowardice on yours.

Whether he does or does not is irrelevant to my previous points.

Choosing to label people who disagree with you 'science-deniers and authoritarians' and then pretending a radical libertarian always takes their side is a rather impressive mountain of dishonest delusions.

You are the worst of the dishonest losers who pretend people are bootlickers and evil for disagreeing with you and leftism.
You should try to be more honest and intellectual and actually consider and respond to points on merit.

The idea that years and years of consistently advocating libertarianism is just some ruse so I can have 'deniability' is so insane its pretty funny.

People here like yourself often fall into this trap of low IQ binary thinking.
Either you agree with leftists and all criticism of Trump or you must be a bootlicker for Trump.
In reality leftists and critics of Trump can be and often are wrong and people who disagree with you are not necessarily Trump supporters or bootlickers.
I support liberty and truth.

You dislike that I combat leftist activism and responded emotionally.


And here we have a usual Cam strategy. Pretending that the broader conclusion is only based on the one thing you referenced even though he knows you've been following politics and the forum for years.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
Jul 8 2020 11:46am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jul 8 2020 01:37pm)
And here we have a usual Cam strategy. Pretending that the broader conclusion is only based on the one thing you referenced even though he knows you've been following politics and the forum for years.


Yeah typical Cam. Accurately denying that he is a Trump supporter or 'bootlicker'.
lol such a terrible thing for him to do.

Why wont he admit it when we repeatedly pretend he loves Trump instead of addressing his points?
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 8 2020 11:48am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jul 8 2020 12:46pm)
Yeah typical Cam. Accurately denying that he is a Trump supporter or 'bootlicker'.
lol such a terrible thing for him to do.

Why wont he admit it when we repeatedly pretend he loves Trump instead of addressing his points?


You aren't a bootlicker, you've ascended to being somebody who deepthroats his big orange d̶o̶n̶g̶ cheeto
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1509510511512513983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll