d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Clinton 2016 > Finally, A Thread For Winners
Prev15051525354183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 40,248
Joined: Feb 14 2007
Gold: 5,737.99
Jul 26 2016 07:56am


Never go full retard

Or was she mocking individuals who have seizures?
Member
Posts: 14,554
Joined: Jan 4 2007
Gold: 109.01
Jul 26 2016 08:02am
Quote (IgoSoHard @ Jul 26 2016 08:56am)
http://media.vidmax.com/media/video3/143381/stream.mp4

Never go full retard

Or was she mocking individuals who have seizures?


this does not go over well for her and it allows folks to raise "is she fit for duty" health questions.
Could this be an unstated reason why she doesnt drive?
Quote
Hillary Clinton disclosed that she hasn't driven a car since the ... "The last time I actually drove a car myself was 1996,



here's another vid /angle slightly slowed down so you can see facial expressions. Looks like a neurological disorder to me that she tries to spin off nonchalantly. None of her people seem surprised/concerned either (nor Hillary for that matter). I wonder if this is related to the concussion she was hospitalized back in 2012 for?
Quote
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was hospitalized Saturday after fainting and striking her head, officials said.
Clinton, who has been battling the flu, fainted and fell, according to a statement released by the State Department.


Hillary Clinton’s blood clot in her skull, doctors say
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/hillary-clintons-blood-clot-most-likely-in-a-leg-experts-say/2012/12/31/d2c853ea-5376-11e2-bf3e-76c0a789346f_story.html
Quote
The clot was discovered during a routine MRI on Sunday at New York-Presbyterian Hospital as Clinton was recuperating from a fall and concussion, according to a statement from spokesman Philippe Reines and the physicians. The doctors predicted a full recovery.

The clot is in the transverse sinus, a large vein that goes around the inner wall of the skull at the back of the head. Her clot is on the right side; there is a similar sinus on the left.

The condition can cause permanent brain damage, coma or death if not detected and treated in time. In Clinton’s case, however, it appears to have caused few if any symptoms and to be responding to treatment with blood-thinning drugs.



At the time I just thought it was a convenient excuse to not have to testify...
Quote
She was expected to testify before Congress on Thursday at hearings on the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. The Associated Press reported that her appearance has now been cancelled.






comment lols
Quote
The reptillian was trying to escape from the skinsuit.


This post was edited by Master_Zappy on Jul 26 2016 08:21am
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Jul 26 2016 08:17am


I too am a medical professional and I have determined rubbing cancer cream and absorbing cancer rays on your face to appear orange for the last decade is more of a health risk than the after effects of a blood clot

though I am clearing both as fit for duty
Member
Posts: 41,259
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Gold: 2,738.71
Jul 26 2016 08:20am
Looks like an episode of clonus not seizure given her awareness of the event
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Jul 28 2016 09:37am
So Trump ended up encouraging the Russians to hack into and leak Clinton's missing 30,000 emails. The Clinton campaign responded by saying it was entirely irresponsible for Trump to do that, that this was a national security issue which should transcend party lines, etc.

My question is, if Hillary didn't do anything wrong and didn't use her private email for classified purposes, why are those missing 30,000 emails a national security issue?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/07/27/clinton_campaign_trump_recklessly_inviting_hackers_to_attack_us_is_a_bridge_too_far.html
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jul 28 2016 09:41am
Quote (Santara @ 28 Jul 2016 11:37)
So Trump ended up encouraging the Russians to hack into and leak Clinton's missing 30,000 emails. The Clinton campaign responded by saying it was entirely irresponsible for Trump to do that, that this was a national security issue which should transcend party lines, etc.

My question is, if Hillary didn't do anything wrong and didn't use her private email for classified purposes, why are those missing 30,000 emails a national security issue?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/07/27/clinton_campaign_trump_recklessly_inviting_hackers_to_attack_us_is_a_bridge_too_far.html

no one will answer this question
also you can't actively "hack" a wiped disconnected server that is sitting in an fbi evidence closet in quantico or wherever...press ran with the hack angle like rudy to the quarterback on the final play.
if it was already "hacked" then that espionage happened when sec (c)linton was active SOS so its on her watch.
if they were leaked well, then its anyone's guess as to why leaked e-mails about yoga and chelsea's wedding plans (sec (c)lintons rationale as to why they deleted those e-mails after a subpoena) would constitute national security issues.
Member
Posts: 14,099
Joined: Jul 13 2006
Gold: 83.30
Jul 28 2016 09:56am
Quote (Santara @ Jul 28 2016 03:37pm)
So Trump ended up encouraging the Russians to hack into and leak Clinton's missing 30,000 emails. The Clinton campaign responded by saying it was entirely irresponsible for Trump to do that, that this was a national security issue which should transcend party lines, etc.

My question is, if Hillary didn't do anything wrong and didn't use her private email for classified purposes, why are those missing 30,000 emails a national security issue?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/07/27/clinton_campaign_trump_recklessly_inviting_hackers_to_attack_us_is_a_bridge_too_far.html


I'd say actively encouraging foreign espionage on government officials is tantamount to treason. And that it doesn't really matter whether it is private or professional information.
Member
Posts: 52,224
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Jul 28 2016 11:10am
Quote (balrog66 @ Jul 28 2016 10:56am)
I'd say actively encouraging foreign espionage on government officials is tantamount to treason. And that it doesn't really matter whether it is private or professional information.


Encouraging hacking of private information of a political candidate is treasonous? I'd have to wholeheartedly disagree.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jul 28 2016 11:15am
Quote (Master_Zappy @ 26 Jul 2016 15:02)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMHOcmDVBP0
comment lols



god lol
Member
Posts: 92,960
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jul 28 2016 11:19am
Quote (Santara @ Jul 28 2016 11:10am)
Encouraging hacking of private information of a political candidate is treasonous? I'd have to wholeheartedly disagree.


Weren't there classified and top secret information emails in the 30k that were deleted? Or am i misremembering
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15051525354183Next
Closed New Topic New Poll