Quote (Tocino @ Jul 14 2024 07:24pm)
Every event probably has some level of threat(s) that are constantly being evaluated by secret service. If they took Trump off the stage for every potential incident it would be bad for Trumpâs image. I donât think itâs unlikely that Trump has these kind of conversations with SS. He doesnât want to ruin his speech and image, unless they are certain of imminent danger. I donât mean to blame Trump, I actually applaud him for his bravery.
Obviously the SS failed, but at the same time their job is hard. Especially if they could not visually confirm a rifle. It would be pretty horrible publicity to kill some photographer kid climbing a ladder to take a long âshotâ.
Edit: typos
your prior wording definitely came off blameful, but i can see the view you're coming from. it's actually not far-fetched to think such without more knowledge about how the S.S. would operate at an event like this normally.
however, this is where i'm going to burst the bubble.
these locations are secured days before, and during arrival. the job of the S.S., CS-teams, other federal and local law enforcement is not to "deal with" a certain scenario. their job is to set up the scenario to prevent failure.
you may see this "rooftop shooter" as being outside of the perimeter of S.S. active protection, but it's far from it. S.S. and other law enforcement deal with these issues before it gets to this point because of how thoroughly it is prevented.
this was one of the easiest places to prevent such an incident. the stage was blocked off from nearly every angle except for the location of the shooter. this wasn't in downtown Chicago with high-rise apartments stacked for miles.
Quote (inkanddagger @ Jul 14 2024 07:56pm)
SSRIs yes but his parents? My parents are to the right of Trump and I'm a commie so that's not really a tell.
it has to do with explosives found, along with alleged idea that his parents were professionals in psychiatric/medicinal fields.
meaning, they may have been diagnosing and prescribing themselves (or able to diagnose). which would be fine i think, but leaves questions pertaining to intentional or negligible association to this instance. especially with explosives.
allegedly, the gun was also his dad's which was purchased ~6months prior.
things to look into, though it's not concerning what their political affiliations are without something else i've not heard of. it would have to be pretty explosive imo for it to matter in that way