Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 25 2020 09:29am)
here are my opinions:
1. the pre investigation something seemed fishy, likely pointed to troll farms and/or facebook ads being improper activity
2. the full blown mueller investigation was silly, a waste of time, collusion was dumb to even go after
3. a proper investigation would have been a far cheaper broader scope look at how social media is affecting our elections, and any potential fixes, be they legislation or more likely leaning on facebook. twitter, etc to clean shit up
4. while the investigation was too pricey, the manafort case specifically was fruit born, even if it wasnt worth the cost
5. FISA warrants and they're stupidly low bar for evidence should be the prevailing headline, and should be fixed
6. lastly, corporate influence generally requires registration so we can at least try and track it, unlike russian troll farms or laundered facebook ad buys. regardless of their impact, no me gusta.
i dont find any of these to be conflicting, all have adjusted with hindsight somewhat, and they neither condemn nor champion what happened.
1. The original FBI investigation seemed fine. It really wasn't a big deal IMO.
2. The Mueller investigation was only necessary once Trump fired Comey. Trump is just an incredible fucking moron
3. I'm not sure what you mean by this.
4. I imagine the Manafort stuff would have been caught anyway. Having a Special Counsel just gave more weight to everything IMO
5. I agree here. I don't know enough about this to give any reasonable reforms though
6. I actually liked Twitter's approach this election. They simply said "fuck it, you can't have any political ads." We probably need regulation where the ad says "Paid for by Terrorists for Bernie" and it needs to take up 25% of space. That organization must register for the FEC otherwise the distributor (i.e. FB, Youtube ,etc.) gets fined.