Quote (majorblood @ Jul 7 2016 09:21pm)

I don't remember him saying this. I remember him saying he doesn't want to get involved with another country's democratic election and supports the people's decision.

Quote (EndlessSky @ 7 Jul 2016 17:27)

No proof. Not an argument.

The military has used it for decades with great success.

Its the best predictor of success in civilized life known to man

Quote (EndlessSky @ Jul 7 2016 06:17pm)

Poor people can commit blue collar crime without getting caught in the same proportions.

His IQ is at least 156 by his proven academic background, which means hes more capable and intelligent than at least 99.5% of all people on earth. He turned one of the most despicable versions of entertainment on earth (reality TV) into a vehicle for glorifying entrepreneurship (the apprentice), which was the most popular of its kind. He's the most renowned real estate developer in the world. He had egalitarian business practices (hired women and minorities with equal if not higher pay) earlier than nearly everyone else. He has decades of history of philanthropy, he build the central park ice skating rink for christ sake, FOR FREE. He directly led to the employment of at least 30,000 in the companies he began, who continue to work as we speak. And he's become successful at politics against career politicians with decades more experience than him, basically overnight. He's one of a kind.

Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 7 2016 09:46pm)

fucking hack.

IQ isn't some abstract fucking idea, and it's not on what school your dad bought you into either. Its a god damn test with quantifiable numbers. Trashpost.

Quote (EndlessSky @ 7 Jul 2016 18:20)

I don't follow.

Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Jul 7 2016 10:22pm)

I'd imagine it's the assertion that you've been asked to prove several times, which is that you can calculate Trump's IQ based on his academic background, which is blatant and utter nonsense backed up by nothing that you are refusing to address?

Quote (EndlessSky @ 7 Jul 2016 18:41)

The purpose of the test is to pinpoint critical thinking ability to a percentile on a bell curve. A series of tests is the standard measurement instrument.

His class rank at Wharton correlates with the scoring of a certain IQ on that test.

If you don't agree with that correlation and methodology, fine. But that's an opinion.

The other butt hurt poster above is just blowing steam.

Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Jul 7 2016 10:43pm)

Keep going and actually try to pretend that you have any actual proof of this class ranking garbage.

Or don't, and expose yourself as a complete and utter hypocrite every single time you ask for a source or a 'real argument' since you can't back up your mouth.

Either way is fine tbh.

Quote (EndlessSky @ 7 Jul 2016 19:38)

SAT scores worked differently, pre-college board era. They cast an accurate IQ distribution back then, and Wharton in the late 60's would be within that percentile I described.

I think we all know his real IQ though.

http://i.imgur.com/8YvjO1e.gif