Quote (Thor123422 @ 8 Jun 2021 21:48)
That's not true, like at all. Federal holidays are massively immitated by industry. They can't mandate time off for private companies, but making it a federal holiday is the closest thing they can do to achieving that goal.
So while on paper it's "only mandatory for a small set of workers", in practical terms, it will almost certainly get adopted by a lot of industries.
It would still not get adopted by some industries while applying 100% for one of the most Dem-friendly voting blocs (federal employees), and thus be a net positive for Democrats. And I think you underestimate the number of people who would not get a day off, and thus the magnitude of this effect.
Imho, the best solution would be to move election day to Sunday and/or make it an official holiday everywhere. The true obstacle here is that for some contrived Murica reason, the state apparently can't make holidays mandatory for the private sector in the U.S.
------------------------------
Quote (thundercock @ 8 Jun 2021 21:46)
This is completely unnecessary, just use mail ballots lol. The fact that we even have an election day shows how far we are behind the times.
Wasnt the reason for holding elections on Tuesdays that a devout Christian had to appear in church on Sunday, and voters from the rurals needed up to two days to make it to the polling sites by foot, horse or carriage?
Truly a tradition to be upheld in the 21st century...

Quote
If the amendments pass state legislatures, then I would consider them mainstream.
Yes, but I'd be surprised if that actually happens. (Talking about the "governor/state legislature can override the popular vote" bills, not the "roll back the mail and absentee voting" stuff.)
Quote
Out of curiosity, are you against making it easier to buy a gun because it would disproportionately affect Republicans? I don't really have a problem with making it easier to exercise your rights but you seem to have a big problem with it.
Casting a vote is a huge responsibility, and quite frankly, many people are not knowledgable and smart enough to make an informed decision. It is for the better of society if certain low propensity, low info voters dont cast a ballot. I have no problem with having a minimum threshold in terms of effort before someone can vote.
Likewise, gun ownership is a huge responsibility, so I dont have a problem with stuff like waiting times or high requirements in terms of gun safety that a potential buyer has to satisfy before he gets his gun. I'm not a 2nd amendment fundamentalist...
In both cases, casting a vote and buying a gun, the requirements must of course not devolve into chicanery. And yes, some of the stuff Republicans have been proposing lately gets into this territory, like the GA law that says helpers may not provide water to people standing in long waiting lines.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jun 8 2021 02:14pm