Quote (Voyaging @ Sep 6 2014 12:08pm)
I'm not a philosophy major but it was my understanding that modern analytical philosophy forms the core of what is taught in universities (Wittgenstein, Popper, Putnam, Kripke, etc.) Maybe I'm way off though.
My university generally has tracts related to legal and political philsophy (law, ethics, critical thinking, etc) or related to philosophy of mind and cognitive science, which is interesting because our psychology department uses the ecological perspective of James Gibson (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_psychology ) which I fundamentally disagree.
Here are some books the faculty wrote:
http://www.artsci.uc.edu/departments/philosophy/fac_staff/books.html Some cool stuff there, and you'll see by the titles the tone of the department. There are analytical classes and strong logicians there as well, but everything on there is based on Wittgenstein, Popper, and reactions to them or problems in their systems (if that is a correct word for that), which is why I was hinting off in my post....
And the lack of true philosophy being written (non-logic stuff anyway) probably has to do with the rise of cinema and the role of movie-maker as modern philosophers. Now that movies are being rendered stupid, repetitive, and unoriginal due to the need for profits (capitalism retarding the spirit and quality of culture) I don't know what is going to take its place.