d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > New Zeland Forces Jabbed Blood On Baby
Prev14567Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 14,525
Joined: Oct 2 2007
Gold: 25,500.67
Dec 8 2022 10:39pm
big flip flop on the pro-life argument there... atleast thats the way i see it.

if a parent cant choose to abort their unborn child, why should a parent be allowed to hold out on life saving surgery?

at this point, the parents have no idea if the baby would have any issues with receiving vaccinated blood or not.
though i get that its still not old enough to comprehend its situation.


This post was edited by C4NTWO on Dec 8 2022 10:41pm
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Dec 8 2022 10:42pm
Quote (addone @ Dec 8 2022 08:32pm)
I would say yes depending on how recent. Over time I think it would get diluted but a simple search can get you the answer instantly as the record database of vaxxed is available to every gp and hospital without ever doing any tests.



I get that feeling also they seem to be wanting others to submit to their "religion".


I guess I'm asking if it as such low levels or not detectable why would anyone care?
Member
Posts: 46,990
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Dec 8 2022 10:42pm
Quote (C4NTWO @ Dec 8 2022 08:39pm)
big flip flop on the pro-life argument there... atleast thats the way i see it.

if a parent cant choose to abort their unborn child, why should a parent be allowed to hold out on life saving surgery?

at this point, the parents have no idea if the baby would have any issues with receiving vaccinated blood or not.


nope
truth is coming out about the bill gates mrna experimental shit shot. that you dont know anything about it doesnt mean the parents dont
Member
Posts: 14,525
Joined: Oct 2 2007
Gold: 25,500.67
Dec 8 2022 10:44pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Dec 8 2022 11:42pm)
nope
truth is coming out about the bill gates mrna experimental shit shot. that you dont know anything about it doesnt mean the parents dont


my comment applies even if covid specifically isnt involved. pretend for a second it isnt covid. im talking about who's rights take priority.
Member
Posts: 16,086
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Dec 8 2022 10:45pm
A question for vaxxed? Would you be happy to accept blood from someone who does drugs especially heavy substances like heroine etc? Would you be ok with donor livers mixed together both compatible but one is from a healthy individual and the other eating shit. Both livers will keep you alive but wouldn't you like to know or have preferance. With a simple label?

Don't people have a right to choose what they can put in their body? Especially blood and other organs?

This post was edited by addone on Dec 8 2022 10:49pm
Member
Posts: 49,893
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Dec 8 2022 10:50pm
Quote (addone @ Dec 9 2022 03:14pm)
So what? If it's not available then it's not available. The hospital can say we are out would you like vaxxed blood instead otherwise go private. 10 sec conversation. Feels like the vaxxed trying to be difficult for no reason.
There are millions of people who were forced to take vaccines at a threat of losing their livelyhood many who would not take vaccine especially what we know. I wouldnt be surprised if that is the majority now.

Why should people be forced to take vaxxed blood when there could easily be supply of non vaxed without any real effort?


I am saying a vaxxed person could die because all the rare blood of his type went to an anti vaxxer who whined their way into it when they had no need for that blood type they just wanted unicorn blood.
Vaccinated blood is IDENTICAL to non vaccinated, this has already been scientifically proven.

Quote (addone @ Dec 9 2022 03:45pm)
A question for vaxxed? Would you be happy to accept blood from someone who does drugs especially heavy substances like heroine etc? Would you be ok with donor livers mixed together both compatible but one is from a healthy individual and the other eating shit. Both livers will keep you alive but wouldn't you like to know or have preferance. With a simple label?

Don't people have a right to choose what they can put in their body? Especially blood and other organs?


This is not the baby choosing, this is the parents choosing to risk the life of the baby because they are science illiterate.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Dec 8 2022 10:51pm
Member
Posts: 22,264
Joined: Aug 17 2021
Gold: 1,546.83
Warn: 30%
Dec 8 2022 11:01pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Dec 8 2022 08:50pm)
I am saying a vaxxed person could die because all the rare blood of his type went to an anti vaxxer who whined their way into it when they had no need for that blood type they just wanted unicorn blood.


Unicorn blood?

You are trivializing and downright disrespecting people's wishes and will. Has it ever occurred to you that people can reject vaxxed blood for reasons that make sense to them? And they don't have to convince you about any of it? You don't get to decide whether the reason people want certain things is legitimate or not.

Quote
This is not the baby choosing, this is the parents choosing to risk the life of the baby because they are science illiterate.


People who disagree with your brand of "science" are not science illiterate. Why are you so cock-sure that you and your side must be right? Has it ever occurred to you that governments, the "scientific community" can all lie to you?

You yourself probably don't have a background in science either. You just lap up everything your government pisses out and you pat yourself on your back thinking you are one of the "scientifically literate". Lol, pathetic.

This post was edited by JessiWan on Dec 8 2022 11:07pm
Member
Posts: 16,086
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Dec 8 2022 11:25pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Dec 9 2022 05:50pm)
I am saying a vaxxed person could die because all the rare blood of his type went to an anti vaxxer who whined their way into it when they had no need for that blood type they just wanted unicorn blood.
Vaccinated blood is IDENTICAL to non vaccinated, this has already been scientifically proven.



This is not the baby choosing, this is the parents choosing to risk the life of the baby because they are science illiterate.


Rare blood is already reserved for other recepients of that blood type. Did you think hospitals are dumb? They been managing rare blood types really well and don't give it out to anyone. In fact they pay money to individuals for exceptionally rare blood types.
Your point is moot.

I think the parents should obviously take what is available but the laws/procedures can most certainly be challenged and amended. But in this case the hospital was being way too stubborn for a simple request.

We have had an entire organisation structure of the way we do business bent over backwards trillions of dollars spent to accommodate vaxxed yet can't perform the simplest request of parents of a child is appalling, like how hard is it to check on a computer if the blood came from a Vax or unvaxed donor?

This post was edited by addone on Dec 8 2022 11:26pm
Member
Posts: 49,893
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Dec 8 2022 11:39pm
Quote (addone @ Dec 9 2022 04:25pm)
Rare blood is already reserved for other recepients of that blood type. Did you think hospitals are dumb? They been managing rare blood types really well and don't give it out to anyone. In fact they pay money to individuals for exceptionally rare blood types.
Your point is moot.

I think the parents should obviously take what is available but the laws/procedures can most certainly be challenged and amended. But in this case the hospital was being way too stubborn for a simple request.

We have had an entire organisation structure of the way we do business bent over backwards trillions of dollars spent to accommodate vaxxed yet can't perform the simplest request of parents of a child is appalling, like how hard is it to check on a computer if the blood came from a Vax or unvaxed donor?


Unvaccinated blood is also rare though, keep that in mind, 97% of the population is vaccinated.. and anti vaxxers are generally selfish self obsessed nut jobs so you have to assume they are about as likely to donate blood as they are to wear a mask to protect grandmas and cancer patients.
Why would they record vax or unvax from donors when ITS SCIENTIFICALLY IDENTICAL?
Do they check black or white blood for the racists? I am sure thom and jessi only want white blood.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Dec 8 2022 11:41pm
Member
Posts: 4,808
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 153.00
Dec 9 2022 12:18am
Quote (JessiWan @ 9 Dec 2022 16:01)
Unicorn blood?

You are trivializing and downright disrespecting people's wishes and will. Has it ever occurred to you that people can reject vaxxed blood for reasons that make sense to them? And they don't have to convince you about any of it? You don't get to decide whether the reason people want certain things is legitimate or not.



People who disagree with your brand of "science" are not science illiterate. Why are you so cock-sure that you and your side must be right? Has it ever occurred to you that governments, the "scientific community" can all lie to you?

You yourself probably don't have a background in science either. You just lap up everything your government pisses out and you pat yourself on your back thinking you are one of the "scientifically literate". Lol, pathetic.


DUDE YOU LITERALLY BELIEVE HOLOCAUST HASN'T HAPPENED and you want to tell others who is or isn't science illiterate???
You don't care about facts. You and facts repel each other.


This post was edited by FantasyWorldII on Dec 9 2022 12:26am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14567Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll