d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Just Another Day In America
Prev14567814Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Oct 24 2022 09:31pm
Quote (Mondain @ 25 Oct 2022 05:27)
Anyone remember shinzo abe's assassin's homegun in Japan...


how many people are killed in japanese schools each year compared to american schools? how many people could abe's assassin have killed with his gun? did you really think you have a point there, lol?



holy shit, gunsexuals aren't particularly bright it seems...

Member
Posts: 22,021
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 333,361.27
Warn: 10%
Oct 24 2022 09:31pm
Quote (fender @ Oct 24 2022 11:31pm)


why do you post such obnoxiously large images
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Oct 24 2022 09:36pm
A well-regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free state. The militia is composed of armed citizens. Ergo, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

The first clause is a preamble explaining the need for the second. Every other interpretation is clearly and obviously wrong. It goes without saying that the intent was to prevent federal tyranny, and giving the federal government the right to circumscribe who can and can't carry a firearm defeats the very purpose of the 2nd Amendment.

To undermine the Bill of Rights is to undermine the rule of law. If it's ok to "reimagine" the 2nd Amendment out of existence, then it's ok to do it with the 1st, and all the others besides. There are clearly prescribed rules for changing an amendment, our friends here would do well to pursue changes through the legal, democratic process.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Oct 24 2022 09:36pm
Quote (Mondain @ 25 Oct 2022 05:31)
why do you post such obnoxiously large images


why do you ask such obnoxiously stupid questions? did you genuinely think you had a point there? 9 gun deaths per anno vs. 9 gun deaths every 2 hours? epic own goal.
Member
Posts: 22,021
Joined: Jun 14 2012
Gold: 333,361.27
Warn: 10%
Oct 24 2022 09:37pm
Quote (fender @ Oct 24 2022 11:36pm)
why do you ask such obnoxiously stupid questions? did you genuinely think you had a point there? 9 gun deaths per anno vs. 9 gun deaths every 2 hours? epic own goal.


toxic
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Oct 24 2022 09:37pm
Quote (bogie160 @ 25 Oct 2022 05:36)
A well-regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free state. The militia is composed of armed citizens. Ergo, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

The first clause is a preamble explaining the need for the second. Every other interpretation is clearly and obviously wrong. It goes without saying that the intent was to prevent federal tyranny, and giving the federal government the right to circumscribe who can and can't carry a firearm defeats the very purpose of the 2nd Amendment.

To undermine the Bill of Rights is to undermine the rule of law. If it's ok to "reimagine" the 2nd Amendment out of existence, then it's ok to do it with the 1st, and all the others besides. There are clearly prescribed rules for changing an amendment, our friends here would do well to pursue changes through the legal, democratic process.


you were had:



that's a conservative btw
Member
Posts: 8,545
Joined: Oct 4 2021
Gold: 281.64
Oct 24 2022 09:42pm
Quote (Mondain @ 24 Oct 2022 20:31)
why do you post such obnoxiously large images


For the boomers that don't have their bifocals on :)
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Oct 24 2022 09:46pm
op’s ancestors started both world wars. who needs to be disarmed first?
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Oct 24 2022 09:52pm
Quote (fender @ Oct 24 2022 11:37pm)
you were had:

https://i.imgur.com/iHT7AHw.png

that's a conservative btw


Ah, yes. A justice roundly mocked for his lack of intellect and whose opinions on virtually any other subject you'd hysterically condemn. Why don't you grab a snippet of his opinions on gays and share it with us all.

He is clearly and obviously wrong, as Scalia, an infinitely more talented jurist, was at pains to explain in 2012. If you can come up with a legitimate rebuttal of Scalia's opinion, which you cannot, then feel free to post it. Otherwise your time in this thread is at an end.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 24 2022 10:00pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Oct 24 2022 10:52pm)
Ah, yes. A justice roundly mocked for his lack of intellect and whose opinions on virtually any other subject you'd hysterically condemn. Why don't you grab a snippet of his opinions on gays and share it with us all.

He is clearly and obviously wrong, as Scalia, an infinitely more talented jurist, was at pains to explain in 2012. If you can come up with a legitimate rebuttal of Scalia's opinion, which you cannot, then feel free to post it. Otherwise your time in this thread is at an end.


Scalia was an incredibly blatant hack that regularly contradicted himself to hurt democrats and help republican presidents. It's really telling how intellectually bankrupt modern conservatism is that they hold him up as a unique talent.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Oct 24 2022 10:01pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14567814Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll