d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Desantis The Classical Liberal
Prev145678Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Apr 23 2022 11:26am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Apr 23 2022 12:18pm)
Take what up? The family rights bill passed and Disney's losing it's tax loophole. We won, time to move on mate.


Disney is losing its "tax loophole" (it really isn't a loophole, since the tax they pay doesn't change) as punishment for them stopping donations to the GOP in FL. Citizens United held that campaign contributions are a form of politically-protected speech, and FL is punishing a private entity because of it. Disney's public position on legislation is also protected speech under that same ruling. So it doesn't matter what the position is, or what the legislation is. It's an unconstitutional infringement of their rights, as determined by SCOTUS in that case.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 23 2022 11:27am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Apr 23 2022 12:04pm)
Corporations threatening politicians to do the 'right thing' isn't free speech. It's legit telling politicians, do this or we will fund your opposition. Literally the opposite of democracy.


That is literally the Democracy that you and other conservatives fought for across decades. Classifying political expenditures as protected speech and including all businesses and corporations in that.

I agree that this is an affront to Democracy, but the difference is I was actively criticizing this kind of thing my entire life, and you were actively defending the people who's express purpose was making it happen.
Member
Posts: 28,879
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Apr 23 2022 11:33am
Quote (Surfpunk @ Apr 23 2022 01:26pm)
Disney is losing its "tax loophole" (it really isn't a loophole, since the tax they pay doesn't change) as punishment for them stopping donations to the GOP in FL. Citizens United held that campaign contributions are a form of politically-protected speech, and FL is punishing a private entity because of it. Disney's public position on legislation is also protected speech under that same ruling. So it doesn't matter what the position is, or what the legislation is. It's an unconstitutional infringement of their rights, as determined by SCOTUS in that case.


Both things passed. If the left wants to go to bat and defend Disney and whatever other corporate donations (oh the irony would be so delicious)let them take it to the SCOTUS. But for now the will of the people won.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 23 2022 11:34am
Leftists and Liberals for 50 years: Hey guys, political donations are a massive conflict of interest and constantly increasing protections on corporations to let them influence more and more of our politics is probably a bad thing.

Conservatives: Why do you hate freedom?

Disney: Maybe don't be shitty to trans people

Conservatives: OMG WHY WOULD YOU SAY THAT THAT'S A TOTAL AFFRONT TO DEMOCRACY AND WE MUST REMOVE ALL OF YOUR RIGHTS. STOP INTERFERRING WITH DEMOCRACY!
Member
Posts: 3,771
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 14,158.00
Apr 23 2022 11:35am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 23 2022 11:34am)
Leftists and Liberals for 50 years: Hey guys, political donations are a massive conflict of interest and constantly increasing protections on corporations to let them influence more and more of our politics is probably a bad thing.

Conservatives: Why do you hate freedom?

Disney: Maybe don't be shitty to trans people

Conservatives: OMG WHY WOULD YOU SAY THAT THAT'S A TOTAL AFFRONT TO DEMOCRACY AND WE MUST REMOVE ALL OF YOUR RIGHTS. STOP INTERFERRING WITH DEMOCRACY!


Plz see a doctor immediately you forgot to take your meds. I am worried for you
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 23 2022 11:35am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Apr 23 2022 12:33pm)
Both things passed. If the left wants to go to bat and defend Disney and whatever other corporate donations (oh the irony would be so delicious)let them take it to the SCOTUS. But for now the will of the people won.


The left doesn't need to defend Disney. Disney will defend themselves using the laws that Republicans and Republican appointed justices created.

You made your bed. This is the future Republicans fought for since the 60's.
Member
Posts: 28,879
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Apr 23 2022 11:39am
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 23 2022 01:35pm)
The left doesn't need to defend Disney. Disney will defend themselves using the laws that Republicans and Republican appointed justices created.

You made your bed. This is the future Republicans fought for since the 60's.


Times are changing my man, being pro-corporations and hawkish are cornerstones of the modern dem party.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Apr 23 2022 11:55am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Apr 23 2022 12:39pm)
Times are changing my man, being pro-corporations and hawkish are cornerstones of the modern dem party.


Being pro-corporation is the cornerstone of both the Democratic and the Republican parties. As is fucking over the common person in the name of political power.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 23 2022 12:22pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Apr 23 2022 12:39pm)
Times are changing my man, being pro-corporations and hawkish are cornerstones of the modern dem party.


Which is why the left doesn't generally turn out for democrats.

Economically we've gone massively to the right and people like you were cheerleaders for it
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Apr 23 2022 01:03pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Apr 23 2022 10:38am)
It's a First Amendment abuse by the state against the speech of an organization with which they disagree (thank Citizens United for that). I mean, you've got the Lt Gov of FL admitting as much on Newsmax. It's also a massive hit to the taxpayers of Orange and Osceola Counties in FL, who are going to have to pick up the tab now that Reedy Creek will be gone. But fuck them, right?


There are a number of reasons for why it doesn't make sense to give Disney special privileges and tax advantaged status. Combined with the fact that Disney is not entitled to their incredibly unique, tax-advantaged state, there's plenty of room for discretion to be left to the state. In addition, it's not all that clear that there is a valid 1st amendment concern here. Disney's status is contingent on it benefiting the state. If the state's voters conclude that Disney is antithetical to their interests, it makes all the sense in the world to treat them like any other company. The tax issues here are secondary, the state will have to work through them. Perhaps Disney needs to pay more to keep their current status.

Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Apr 23 2022 02:22pm)
Which is why the left doesn't generally turn out for democrats.

Economically we've gone massively to the right and people like you were cheerleaders for it


The Democratic party of old was an anti-Bush, anti-Cheney party. They fought against a Republican party led by that constituency for years. I have to wonder whether the perception of Bush/Cheney as great antagonists didn't lead to the present day Democratic party in over-valuing the worth of their present support. Democratic media has been hyping the Romney's and Cheney's of the world, all the while rehabilitating George W's legacy. The sense seems to be that this is a great score, the Republicans are split, and the old enemy is now our friend. All of this without recognizing that that particular faction of the Republican was always the junior partner of Protestant Evangelicalism, and is much smaller today than it was ~20 years back.

This post was edited by bogie160 on Apr 23 2022 01:10pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev145678Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll