Why does it matter?

In other words, you can't define a biological male.

I understand your difficulty.

I have a personal definition of "biological male", but I'm asking you why my personal definition matters.

It's just pure stupidity nowadays for this to be even a debate. Between reproductive organs and chromosomes this has been settled. This has been settled way before we even studied chromosomes by looking at all other mammals.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Apr 14 2022 08:58am

Biological male = Born with Penis
Biological female = Born with vagina
Biological hermaprodite = Born with both

Everything else is something society created.

It's kind of nice to define the terms before we start a discussion about them.

Anyway, I would love to hear your personal definition of biological male.

What discussion are you wanting to have?



So what would you describe somebody with male chromosomes who is born immune to androgens and so they develop female genitalia and internal testicals?

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Apr 14 2022 09:11am

I asked you a question first. Please try to answer it first before you pose questions of your own.

Your personal definition of what a biological male is. Lets hear it.

This post was edited by JessiWan on Apr 14 2022 09:12am

How you define something depends on the discussion and audience. If we are talking about medical science my definition will be much more nuanced than if we are talking about something more mundane.

Xy = male
Xx= female

there is no personal definition