d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Qanon Dallas Rally - Flynn Calls For Coup
Prev145678Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 2 2021 10:45am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jun 2 2021 11:00am)
Public universities are not the same thing as someone's private property.

Yes violently protesting and interrupting events to shut down speech is in fact shutting down speech and a form of censorship.


There's an argument to be made that violence is not the way to stop somebody from speaking if you don't want them speaking at your university.

Public universities are not places where you get to say anything on their stage. They don't owe you a forum at a university because you want to speak at a university. A university is not the same as private property, but it's also not a totally open public forum. A university is not the town square.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Jun 2 2021 10:46am
Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 2 2021 12:32pm)
i like how you weave between calling ANTIFA unintimidating weirdos when u have mugshots, a threat to america when they throw a pepsi can, and a legitimate threat to safety despite being present at thousands of speaking events and never having attacked a speaker (afaik).

even more funny that u support private security as an alternative to police but also seem to think they cant protect speakers adequately so the Proud Boys counter protesters are justified.

Speakers wanted to save on security, outsourced it to patreon simps with false narratives, and Universities were understandably not willing to let a mob enter their campus with no legal liability tying them to the event which invariably went violent.

Shapiro got smart, hired private security, and kept a sense of legitimacy and his speaking engagements. Cucks like Gavin and Milo tried to fan flames then cried when they got burned. both are now relegated to doing bitchute videos on alt media and a string of LOOK AT ME stunts to remain relevant while Ben has an emerging media company that's highly successful on all mainstream media platforms other than a few demonetization hiccups which actually make him more money in the macro.


Yes lets continue to show your ignorance and make up more weak strawmen.
Surely that will be a valid form of argumentation and won't make you look even worse.

There many examples of antifa attacking people. Its not 'made up', (btw i still do not accept your new definition of 'making it up' to mean 'actually exists')

Quote
your entire argument boils down to "well i didnt get fooled, so they didnt make it all up". unsurprisingly gross.


More blatant dishonesty instead of admitting you were wrong on several counts. Pathetic.

You tried to shift the argument to 'YOU WERE FOOLED! THEY MADE MONEY!!' when i pointed out you were wrong about several things.
Recognizing that I was not in fact fooled and have no problem with them making money does not make that^ my entire argument. Complete nonsense.

Shamefully celebrating the fact that some people were censored and removed from platforms by major corporations does nothing to defend any of your points.

You were wrong and soundly beaten by me. Keep wriggling uncomfortably. You are on the hook.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jun 2 2021 10:46am
Member
Posts: 92,990
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jun 2 2021 10:58am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jun 2 2021 11:46am)
Yes lets continue to show your ignorance and make up more weak strawmen.
Surely that will be a valid form of argumentation and won't make you look even worse.

There many examples of antifa attacking people. Its not 'made up', (btw i still do not accept your new definition of 'making it up' to mean 'actually exists')



More blatant dishonesty instead of admitting you were wrong on several counts. Pathetic.

You tried to shift the argument to 'YOU WERE FOOLED! THEY MADE MONEY!!' when i pointed out you were wrong about several things.
Recognizing that I was not in fact fooled and have no problem with them making money does not make that^ my entire argument. Complete nonsense.

Shamefully celebrating the fact that some people were censored and removed from platforms by major corporations does nothing to defend any of your points.

You were wrong and soundly beaten by me. Keep wriggling uncomfortably. You are on the hook.


your ability to pick up on blatant sardonic posts and take them so seriously that you type a full response as if they're 100% legitimate would be sad if it weren't so fucking funny at this point.

no wonder u cheered when Gavin took Viv's 3 star antifa supersoldier title literally and then beat it to horsepulp.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Jun 2 2021 11:11am
Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 2 2021 12:58pm)
your ability to pick up on blatant sardonic posts and take them so seriously that you type a full response as if they're 100% legitimate would be sad if it weren't so fucking funny at this point.

no wonder u cheered when Gavin took Viv's 3 star antifa supersoldier title literally and then beat it to horsepulp.


I recognized you made some sardonic comments that misrepresented my arguments. A crutch for being unable to defend your position.

Now you resort to the 'haha i was just kidding and you responded seriously' card.. i was only pretending to be retarded.jpg

>its funny..haha.. im laughing..im not owned




But sure lets say all of your posts were just 'joking' every time you were wrong about something and you shouldn't be taken seriously. Your terms are acceptable.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jun 2 2021 11:14am
Member
Posts: 40,852
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Jun 2 2021 11:19am
Quote (cambovenzi @ 2 Jun 2021 17:31)
Finally a shred of honesty. Thanks for conceding the points snipa wants to dishonestly pretend are valid.

bad news for you, freakshow delusional leftists aren't the majority either.

Openly against free speech and property rights = "freedom loving leftists'
pretending milquetoast conservatives are trying to abolish freedom of speech, when you are literally the one against free speech.
wewlad the delusions are strong.


I'm pro-free speech. I want to maximise it. For everybody.

I also don't want government restrictions on it.

You see the true freedom loving people are the anarchists. The ones who don't just suck the dick of any demagogue who comes along and asks them to sacrifice their freedoms to save them from the brown people (patriot act) or the other brown people (conservative war on CRT).

Member
Posts: 92,990
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jun 2 2021 11:21am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jun 2 2021 12:11pm)
I recognized you made some sardonic comments that misrepresented my arguments. A crutch for being unable to defend your position.

Now you resort to the 'haha i was just kidding and you responded seriously' card.. i was only pretending to be retarded.jpg

>its funny..haha.. im laughing..im not owned
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/909/525/70a.png



But sure lets say all of your posts were just 'joking' every time you were wrong about something and you shouldn't be taken seriously. Your terms are acceptable.


the fact that after years of me just poking you you seem to continually try to act like im interested in (let alone should be embarrassed by) engaging you in a fact based debate is humorous.

i dont find you as a human being worthy of me doing 5 minutes of Wiki research, yet you type essays for me on a weekly basis. you have quite the opinion of me, and i thank you for it.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Jun 2 2021 11:21am
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Jun 2 2021 11:26am
Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 2 2021 01:21pm)
the fact that after years of me just poking you you seem to continually try to act like im interested in (let alone should be embarrassed by) engaging you in a fact based debate is humorous.

i dont find you as a human being worthy of me doing 5 minutes of Wiki research, yet you type essays for me on a weekly basis. you have quite the opinion of me, and i thank you for it.


I fully recognize you are unable to match me in any intellectual challenge and run from debate once its clear the facts and arguments don't go your way.

Personally hating me for being better than you is irrelevant and a poor excuse for not knowing what you are talking about. A weak justification for your cowardice and failures.

Yes getting me to post every once in awhile explaining why your sincerely held beliefs are wrong is a big win for you. Sure. You got me. :rolleyes:
Member
Posts: 92,990
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jun 2 2021 11:28am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jun 2 2021 12:26pm)
I fully recognize you are unable to match me in any intellectual challenge and run from debate once its clear the facts and arguments don't go your way.

Personally hating me for being better than you is irrelevant and a poor excuse for not knowing what you are talking about. A weak justification for your cowardice and failures.

Yes getting me to post every once in awhile explaining why your sincerely held beliefs are wrong is a big win for you. Sure. You got me. :rolleyes:


you're just a rat in a trap bragging about the silly giant who left u a meal of peanut butter.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jun 2 2021 11:29am
meme reference: "kill it with fire"
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Jun 2 2021 11:39am
Quote (MxVivianWulf @ Jun 2 2021 01:19pm)
I'm pro-free speech. I want to maximise it. For everybody.

I also don't want government restrictions on it.

You see the true freedom loving people are the anarchists. The ones who don't just suck the dick of any demagogue who comes along and asks them to sacrifice their freedoms to save them from the brown people (patriot act) or the other brown people (conservative war on CRT).


Yes being pro-free speech by endorsing violence and censorship against speech you don't like.
A very clear contradiction, but no one ever accused your ideology of being consistent or logical.

These SJW types can't compete in a battle of ideas so they choose censorship and violence and absurd portrayals of speech as violence and nazism or nazi-adjacent.

The patriot act being wrong doesn't make being a censorious violent communist right.
One might have assumed you weren't big on false binaries.

Free speech includes speech you don't necessarily like.
The world isn't going to burn down if some goofball makes an edgy joke or if little Ben is allowed to say free speech is good and dunk on some blue haired SJWs with his tepid and safe talking points.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev145678Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll