lol yes they will, Democrats almost never pull a Romney unless its a gimme (like Manchin approving a SC justice in exchange for some doofus abstaining from voting) because the (D) mafia woulda cast them out forever

e: Warnock abused his wife and tried to run over her foot with a luxury car and is about to win lmao.

This post was edited by excellence on Jan 5 2021 08:32pm

A: "My god, this guy must have ONE HECK of a personality"
B: "My god, this guy must be rich af"

2% up on both these fools.

Eh betting markets oddly arent very good at elections. Predicting these elections while you've got pre-voting this high and having it hard to determine what is remaining is reeeeally hard. I was a lobbyist on the hill for a while and during the 2010 and 2012 elections. This is just a very different environment.

Republican lead is too small to compensate the incoming late "blue shift" ballots. I guess, very much.

I dont think they'd go for a blanket filibuster nuke. Imho, they would only remove it for some specific votes, with which they then try to rig the system in their favor (DC + PR statehood, pack the supreme court). I just dont see the party of sleepy Joe and clumsy Nancy being quite as ruthless to go for a full-throttled, unapologetic power grab right out of the gate.

this is a tale as old as time..should people marry for love like hillary did with slick willie?

tbf the obamas and gwb/laura bush look like they have very happy marriages so it can happen

Obamas and Bushes are good couples. Clintons seem like a political marriage.

I think this track record is very good: https://www.electionbettingodds.com/TrackRecord.html

robert byrd’s protege marrying some sax-playing smooth-talking hick from Arkansas? yeah agree definitely political