Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 16 2020 02:31pm)
There's a line you can cross where "they showed the problem and said the problem was bad" goes overboard, even if the ultimate message is that it's bad.
Like, I really like the movie American Psycho, and read the book, and I while I didn't really like the book I don't think it was a problem that it was made.
I think this went over that line. You can make a film about how sexualizing children is bad without making it so explicit. I'm just putting my opinion out there. I think this needed to be toned back a few steps.
imo if it was toned back it wouldnt have gotten any traction, and the message of sexualizing young girls wouldnt have been pushed as far to the forefront.
is that not the argument made by liberals for violent or property damaging protests? blocking highways, burning state buildings, smashing windows, etc. eventually a problem gets to a level and must be addressed, if it makes people uncomfortable GOOD. i'd rather do that through media than stopping people getting to work. "its different tho", yeah yeah, i get it. i hear the GOP say that about kneelers, "it's different". the crowd in hte movie was visibly uncomfortable, the audience in their homes is uncomfortable, seems successful in making a lasting point.
in Irréversible, a french film, Monica Belluci is anally raped for 2 straight minutes of screen time, then brutally beat into unconsciousness. its one of the most vivid memories of my life and legitimately changed who i acted towards women.