d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Aoc Democratic Primary
Prev14567813Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Jun 23 2020 12:05pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jun 23 2020 02:01pm)
It shows how little commitment you have to your ideals. You will selectively criticize one party over the other when they commit the same acts.


An idiotic and baseless assertion.

Like I said, read my previous responses the last few times you brought it up.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jun 23 2020 12:05pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jun 23 2020 11:01am)
Since when is the democratic party freedom of association? How sub 80.


People literally choose to become members of political parties (by registering as such during primaries, etc), or associate with them. Talk about sub 80. Might as well ban the NRA, or the NAACP, or the Teamsters, while you're at it.



This post was edited by Surfpunk on Jun 23 2020 12:10pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 23 2020 12:07pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jun 23 2020 01:05pm)
An idiotic and baseless assertion.

Like I said, read my previous responses the last few times you brought it up.


I did read them, they were unconvincing.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Jun 23 2020 12:11pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Jun 23 2020 02:05pm)
People literally choose to become members of political parties, or associate with them. Talk about sub 80. Might as well ban the NRA, or the NAACP, or the Teamsters, while you're at it.

https://media.tenor.com/images/8803755f40b165648ef78d04764ea404/tenor.gif


People choose to become members so the democrats literally are the concept of freedom of association itself?
No. They are not the same thing.

Its entirely legitimate to support the abolition of a disgusting criminal organization.
"Abolish a corrupt political party that unjustly rules over others and opposes freedom of association" =/= "abolish freedom of association"

Democrats themselves could choose to abolish their own party.

You were wrong and dumb on multiple levels of analysis.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Jun 23 2020 12:16pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jun 23 2020 02:07pm)
I did read them, they were unconvincing.


Again, I will not apologize for your deficiencies.
I do not control whether bad faith leftist losers are convinced or not.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 23 2020 12:17pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jun 23 2020 01:11pm)
People choose to become members so the democrats literally are the concept of freedom of association itself?
No. They are not the same thing.

Its entirely legitimate to support the abolition of a disgusting criminal organization.
"Abolish a corrupt political party that unjustly rules over others and opposes freedom of association" =/= "abolish freedom of association"

Democrats themselves could choose to abolish their own party.

You were wrong and dumb on multiple levels of analysis.


You really think people are arguing the bold? Fuck you're stupid.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jun 23 2020 12:19pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jun 23 2020 01:11pm)
People choose to become members so the democrats literally are the concept of freedom of association itself?
No. They are not the same thing.

Its entirely legitimate to support the abolition of a disgusting criminal organization.
"Abolish a corrupt political party that unjustly rules over others and opposes freedom of association" =/= "abolish freedom of association"

Democrats themselves could choose to abolish their own party.

You were wrong and dumb on multiple levels of analysis.


Choosing to dissolve themselves internally is not the same as an external force trying to do the same. You can apply your "corrupt political party" and "disgusting criminal organization" labels to the GOP, as well. But your feels don't get to dictate with whom others associate, regardless of the ethical implications.

Fuck outta here, caricature.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 23 2020 12:20pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Jun 23 2020 01:19pm)
Choosing to dissolve themselves internally is not the same as an external force trying to do the same. You can apply your "corrupt political party" and "disgusting criminal organization" labels to the GOP, as well. But your feels don't get to dictate with whom others associate, regardless of the ethical implications.

Fuck outta here, caricature.


He's literally become the parody posts I used to make about libertarians
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jun 23 2020 12:27pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jun 23 2020 01:20pm)
He's literally become the parody posts I used to make about libertarians


I mean, fuck...he took my initial comment the completely wrong way and ran with it. At no point was I even referring to Dem policy/platform with regard to association. My point was simply that a political party is an entity with which people can associate as members, supporters, candidates, etc. This is Civics 101-level shit.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Jun 23 2020 12:28pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Jun 23 2020 02:19pm)
Choosing to dissolve themselves internally is not the same as an external force trying to do the same


In my original comment I didn't mention any external force or any specifics at all.
I said "Abolish the democratic party" and you responded "ABOLISH FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION! HOW UNLIBERTARIAN!"

..right after whining when I joked the democratic party needs an exorcism when skinned said AOC was the soul of the party.

Abolishing the democratic party would be entirely consistent with libertarianism.

If I said "Abolish government" would pretend that means i'm for abolishing freedom of association and its not libertarian?
People voluntarily joined government after all, and that is your 'logical' standard.

Quote
You can apply your "corrupt political party" and "disgusting criminal organization" labels to the GOP, as well. But your feels don't get to dictate with whom others associate, regardless of the ethical implications.

Yes, and?

Did I state otherwise? No.
Does that refute any of my points? No

Just low IQ whataboutism from an unjustifiably arrogant leftist.

Quote
Fuck outta here, caricature.


Leftist loser crying and defending democrats but cant scrape together enough brain cells to understand whats going on and make an intelligent point.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jun 23 2020 12:29pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14567813Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll