They can enjoy the "fruits of their labor".

that doesnt answer the question. it just generalizes all cops as bad, which is untrue. the exact ratio is up for debate, but it is indisputable that many cops are good cops, and randomly attacking police is morally despicable when you may be taking an innocent life. thats not justice in any way shape or form. its just a childish knee-jerk reaction of someone hurt me, so im gonna hurt someone else. when i was about 7 or so, i was in little league. after one game when we were passing by the other team congratulating each other and shaking hands etc, someone from the other team punched me in the nuts as he passed by me. being an ignorant child, i reacted by punching the next guy i passed from the other team in the nuts. at the time it seemed like an appropriate response, but now as a muture thinking adult with morals, i realize that it was wrong. the other kid did nothing to me, he didnt deserve anything.

are liberals really no better than a seven year old kid who responds without thinking? they cant see see that randomly attacking others who may or may not have done something wrong is wrong? anyone who cant/wont condemn randomly attacking cops is a despicable person. asbsolut shameful...

Unless they're arresting fellow cops like they did in Atlanta the other night when they attacked 2 people in their car, they're aren't a good cop. They're merely "a cop".
The NYPD is probably at the bottom of my sympathies list on this topic and their safety is the least of my worries right now.
Idk how liberals feel on the topic of hitting cops with cars, they're probably against it given the violent nature of it.

+2 Trump supporters

unless theyre a BAD cop they dont deserve to be run over.

bottom of the list? how hard is it to care about ALL people other than bad people? not really hard imo...

We just classify bad actors differently. You have a higher threshold for whats considered bad.

That news story was a lie. You're naive, heartless, and more importantly clueless.

What story? I saw the attack, caught on film. Was the police getting punished for it fake?

perhaps, but thats kinda the meaning of the words. actively doing evil is bad. actively doing good is good. in between is those neither actively seeking to good nor actively seeking to do wrong. you cant lump them in with the bad, saying "well, if youre not actively doing good then youre bad". it could just as easily go the other way.