d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Official Super Tuesday And Beyond Thread > The Last Official Thread Of The Primary
Prev14567821Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Mar 3 2020 07:01pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 4 Mar 2020 01:44)
Yup, I gotta agree with that. For fender, everyone who opposes his worldview is a "moronic hack voting against his own interests". :rolleyes:


that's complete bullshit. learn to read. what i'm saying is that anyone who cares about the issues that i listed, but then supports an establishment candidate (or trump), is a "moronic hack voting against their own interests". people who don't give a shit about wages, healthcare, the environment, education, money in politics... are of course NOT voting against their interest by supporting a corporate shill of either party. although i obviously disagree with them, their vote at least makes sense.

the stupid part is voting for biden and expecting him to do something about corruption in washington, to hold wall street accountable, to oppose the military industrial complex, or the insurance industry. it would be equally stupid for a billionaire whose goal is to maximise their wealth to vote for bernie, or a racist whose main concern is the rule of the white race not to vote for trump. this has absolutely nothing to do with my own personal views. there was a clear premise to my post that you completely ignored for a lazy ad hom...

This post was edited by fender on Mar 3 2020 07:03pm
Member
Posts: 18,491
Joined: Sep 2 2008
Gold: 0.00
Mar 3 2020 07:02pm
if Biden's the nom
i'm a pretty lazy voter...
just sayin'

Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
Mar 3 2020 07:04pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 3 Mar 2020 17:54)
Of course her withdrawal was the result of shenanigans. But I dont have an issue with that tbh. She clearly had no path to the nomination, and staying in the race would only have hurt the candidate(s) she's more ideologically aligned with.
Also, I dont see the problem in the DNC trying to get the party to get the nominee who would be better for down-ballot Democratic candidates in November. They should of course not outright cheat, but imho, they dont do that. Bernie and the progressive wing do not have a majority among the primary electorate, no matter how much more enthused his supporters are compared to those of Biden/Klobuchar/Bloomberg.

Simply put, if a majority of the primary voters prefers a moderate candidate, then I see no problem with the DNC making sure that the candidates from the moderate line dont step on each other's feet.

I also disagree with the notion that Biden has no chance against Trump and would be Hillary 2.0. Hillary was a very polarizing figure, half the country already hated her before she even anounced her candidacy. Her own unpopularity cancelled out Trump's unpopularity to a certain degree. There are much less hard feelings toward Biden. Other factors are pointing in Trump's favor, like the advantage of incumbency, a strong economy, the world not having ended under his watch like some pundits predicted, and a more organized and professional campaign. Therefore, I personally rate a potential Trump vs Biden race as close to a tossup despite Biden being much less unpopular than Hillary was in 2016.


You're right. Part of me is being dramatic just because so much of me senses DNC shenanigans again. Biden is indeed a better candidate than Clinton was. Problem is, Trump is the incumbent now, and despite being controversial, he has actually had a very solid first term. That said, where I disagree with you is a potential Biden-Trump race being a tossup. I'd make Trump about the 80-20 favorite against Biden honestly.
Member
Posts: 54,184
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Mar 3 2020 07:05pm
Quote (fender @ 3 Mar 2020 23:21)
it's so funny. people (on both sides, and from all backgrounds) act like they are in favour of things like universal healthcare, adequate wages, worker rights, environmental protection, affordable education, and against the washington establishment, against the donor class dictating policy by basically buying their president through financial contributions -


well, duh, of course people from all sides and backgrounds like "free stuff" and would like redistributional policies where they are on the winning side. but in the real world, distributional struggles are much more common than most people want to admit - there are just a ton of zero-sum situations. in reality, 'someone's gotta pay for it', and most people are smart enough to know that the idea of just making the top 0.1% pay for almost all of it is just not realistic. take obamacare as an example: it mostly amounts to a redistribution from the upper and lower middle classes toward the working-class and the poor. similar situation in Scandinavia and most European countries: the bulk of the money redistributed by their more generous welfare states is coming from the middle class and ordinary professionals, not from the super rich.


when it comes to healthcare, I'm with you that the American system sucks and that they should implement something like the Australian, Austrian or Dutch system. so that's one area where you're mostly right with your criticism imho. nonetheless, Bernie's medicare4all plans go far beyond anything you have in Europe, Australia or Canada. he's overshooting the target by quite a lot and thus allows the forces of the status quo to level valid (!!) criticism against his plans.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Mar 3 2020 07:08pm
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Mar 3 2020 07:10pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Mar 3 2020 08:41am)
Even CNN is doing a bad painting of Bernie Sanders



Even???

CNN and other center right media hate progressives and always have.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Mar 3 2020 07:10pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ 4 Mar 2020 02:04)
You're right. Part of me is being dramatic just because so much of me senses DNC shenanigans again. Biden is indeed a better candidate than Clinton was. Problem is, Trump is the incumbent now, and despite being controversial, he has actually had a very solid first term. That said, where I disagree with you is a potential Biden-Trump race being a tossup. I'd make Trump about the 80-20 favorite against Biden honestly.


i think that strongly depends on HOW biden becomes the democratic nominee. if he wins it outright, his chances might be around 40-50 percent. if he 'steals' it in a brokered convention, i'd say that even 20% is too high...
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Mar 3 2020 07:10pm


not exonerated of being an athiest satanic abortion-loving (D) political figure tells the (R) chairperson to “go to hell” for even suggesting the DNC may rig the primary against Barnie (again)
Member
Posts: 54,184
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Mar 3 2020 07:13pm
Quote (fender @ 4 Mar 2020 02:10)
i think that strongly depends on HOW biden becomes the democratic nominee. if he wins it outright, his chances might be around 40-50 percent. if he 'steals' it in a brokered convention, i'd say that even 20% is too high...


This.

One minor caveat though: it's not necessarily "stealing" the nomination if Bernie enters the convention with a slim plurality while the moderate candidates jointly have a majority of the delegates. Say Bernie has 42%, Warren 3%, Biden 39%, Bloomberg 10% and Buttigieg 4%. In this scenario, Biden becoming the nominee would not involve any shenanigans or stealing.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Mar 3 2020 07:14pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 4 Mar 2020 02:05)
well, duh, of course people from all sides and backgrounds like "free stuff" and would like redistributional policies where they are on the winning side. but in the real world, distributional struggles are much more common than most people want to admit - there are just a ton of zero-sum situations. in reality, 'someone's gotta pay for it', and most people are smart enough to know that the idea of just making the top 0.1% pay for almost all of it is just not realistic. take obamacare as an example: it mostly amounts to a redistribution from the upper and lower middle classes toward the working-class and the poor. similar situation in Scandinavia and most European countries: the bulk of the money redistributed by their more generous welfare states is coming from the middle class and ordinary professionals, not from the super rich.


when it comes to healthcare, I'm with you that the American system sucks and that they should implement something like the Australian, Austrian or Dutch system. so that's one area where you're mostly right with your criticism imho. nonetheless, Bernie's medicare4all plans go far beyond anything you have in Europe, Australia or Canada. he's overshooting the target by quite a lot and thus allows the forces of the status quo to level valid (!!) criticism against his plans.


for that to be logically coherent with your opposition to my post though, you'd have to conclude that supporting someone who won't do ANYTHING significant about most of those issues makes more sense than supporting someone who addresses them, just not exactly the way that you would prefer. and while i'm aware that's a common narrative, that still doesn't mean it makes any sense. because it doesn't. like at all...
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
Mar 3 2020 07:15pm
Quote (excellence @ 3 Mar 2020 18:10)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QW-_QkQlWpI

not exonerated of being an athiest satanic abortion-loving (D) political figure tells the (R) chairperson to “go to hell” for even suggesting the DNC may rig the primary against Barnie (again)


Pretty rich coming from Brazile.

DNC and Democratic party just don't have good political talent at the moment, from leadership (former and current) to candidates.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14567821Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll