Quote (fender @ Nov 8 2018 11:56am)
a video showing only the relevant part of the press conference is not the same as a 'doctored' video. false equivalence through the roof again. i explained it to you MULTIPLE times already that the video i provided shows the incident in real speed - unlike the video the official white house press secretary posted, that was edited in a way to exaggerate the speed of acosta's arm fending off the intern's arm, to make it look like he was 'chopping it away'.
the fact that you went even further than the crooked administration, and claimed that what they were trying to hide by fabricating this excuse (that asking uncomfortable questions is reason to get your press pass suspended) should be a valid reason, speaks for itself btw - apparently trump isn't already authoritarian enough for you... that's how much you love 'freedom', haha...
btw, i don't even like cnn - like the vast majority of mainstream media, they are establishment shills who outright refuse to give progressives any airtime, and instead give coverage worth billions to corporate democrats and republicans. you are the one who has a dog in this fight, not i.
complaining about doctored video and then post an edited doctored video of your own doesn't further your argument at all ofender. Also you not even bothering to post the video in question that you are saying is doctored. What am I suppose to take the time and look for the video myself? or should I just take you word that its doctored... no link provided= fake news
The simple fact that you cried about fake news, but then posted some fake news video of your own is laughable. Considering that the entire video of the incident with a better angle is easily available and only like 3 minutes total. That is the video I saw and made my judgement (full length). That's clearly the video I would have posted to try and further my point/view. Not some bias cut piece that
DOES NOT show the entire incident. You didn't even bother to post the other video to compare... Just makes me wonder from what material you try and form your idiotic opinions and why would anyone take you serious knowing the laziness with which you form these opinions/posts.
Quote (Skinned @ Nov 8 2018 11:56am)
Trump also called them Invaders which is factually wrong and they are coming legally because they're planning to ask for Asylum.
This is what happens when elect a president who doesn't even understand the issues or law.
So he was making racial statements on the podium and he was called out for it and it pissed him off. He threw a temper tantrum, something he is known for, and made an ass of himself again.
I'm just glad somebody has the boss work on them out on calling individuals invaders for coming here while being Brown. This is a conservative Tradition though. Even back when the Irish weren't considered white lol.
I think the president understands the issues with the law just fine. Fact is non citizens say they are going to enter US illegally, thus breaking the law. Now there are reports they want asylum, which sure that's fine. But do they truly deserve it? Were they coached to say this? Are they just looking for economic asylum. From what I see just a bunch of single working age males coming to America for work.
Obviously the president doesn't think they are all truly refugees. He thinks they are exploiting the system/ laws in place, and in fact have publicly said they have little regard for the law of the US (at least immigration).
Obviously if they were not refugees seeking asylum which u blindly seem to believe, and they threaten to break the laws of the US, well then, I think they would be leaning more towards the label of invaders. President seems to feel this way, hes not the only one. Jim accoster seems to think like you do...
It clearly seems that you are the one who doesn't understand the issue, not the president. Because you think the dude doesn't know the difference between invaders and asylum seekers... cmon.
This post was edited by GuyLadouche on Nov 8 2018 07:21am