the whole partisan hypocrisy argument shows your political leanings more than theirs, even though they have one no doubt.

they cover big news stories, not little news stories. When Franken or any of the liberal rich contributors from hollywood got accused it was on their front page like any right leaning source.

the fact that you thought this was an actual analysis is pretty telling of how badly you need your biases confirmed.

There are 25 counterexamples on the first post. How many examples do you have?

How exactly is 25 mostly state level reps a counter example to what i said? Did you even read what i posted.

None of these people is on the level of Al Franken, Weinstein, Moore, etc. All of those are high profile cases. Pulling out Bill Clinton accusers is about the best it has, and there's an effect where each additional accuser becomes less newsworthy, see:Cosby.

A colorado state law maker literally no one outside of denver has ever heard of, gosh that's front page newsworthy.

The truth u can't accept is these media cockroaches will run ANY story that gets them clicks as long as its not on the brass of the media company itself such as the Ailes stuff for Fox until it got too big to ignore.

Do they have a partisan lean? of course. Does that lean cause them to downplay and even ignore for a time certain stories, of course. Is a list of nobodies compared to Moore an illustration of that, of course, if you're retarded.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Nov 28 2017 02:44pm

So... zero examples. Thank you

in that post i actually provided a number of examples. i see its your reading that's at fault.

let me make it easy for you, did CNN report the Franken saga?

This new trend is actually a preferable alternative to this "Not an argument" thing that you used to do.

"not an argument" = white flag from ES.

he's one of the more transparent dodgers of the sub

This post was edited by thesnipa on Nov 29 2017 09:08am