Quote (Ylem122 @ Oct 2 2013 10:37pm)
eye for an eye is an aspect of judasim, it is not an aspect of christianity. Christianity is not judaisim, it is refined, and pacafist. it is not a set of laws, but a way to approach things.
there are people that do some very un christian things and call them self christians, that is not what im talking about. if you want to say that a large portion of christians dont follow chirists teachings, thats fine, but you seem to claim christianity = judeaisim, that is wrong, they are diffrent teachiings.
well, im not saying christianity is or even was supposed to be exactly like judaism. jesus definitely did make some changes. but he never gave a blanket statement saying that you shouldnt follow the commandments in general. no where does it say 'thou shalt no longer rest on the sabbath, nor shalt thou refrain from the eating of the swine, being most tasty and delicious." nor did he ever say that sacrifices, including sin-offerings were or would be no longer brought once he became the grand sin offering for all. and evidence shows that they kept bringing sacrifices for quite some time after he died, until paul said it wasnt needed anymore. (see acts 21:17-26 where you clearly see that the followers of jesus living in jerusalem kept to the law, and asked paul to join in a sin-offering to show that he was as well.)
Quote (Ylem122 @ Oct 2 2013 10:37pm)
eye for an eye is an aspect of judasim, it is not an aspect of christianity. Christianity is not judaisim, it is refined, and pacafist.it is not a set of laws, but a way to approach things.
there are people that do some very un christian things and call them self christians, that is not what im talking about. if you want to say that a large portion of christians dont follow chirists teachings, thats fine, but you seem to claim christianity = judeaisim, that is wrong, they are diffrent teachiings.
Do on to otheres as you would have them do to you vs do onto others as they have done onto you.
re:bolded
judaism is not just a set of laws, either, theres a way to approach things as well. a non-jew once came to a rabbi hillel and said he would convert if he could teach him the entire torah while standing on one foot. he replied "That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. That is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary. Go and study it."
which brings us to the second bolded part, which is incorrect. the jewish version of the dictum is what i quoted above. christians say "do unto others what you would have done to you". the underlying intention is basically the same, but theres an important difference. the christian version preaches action, whereas the jewish version teaches inaction. if someone's desires are outside normal, the christian version tells them to go out and do that to others, who may not want it themselves. (ie a sadist likes being whipped. should they go out and whip others because they would have it done to them?)
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Oct 3 2013 03:12am)
My house will be called a house of prayer, but you are making it a den of robbers
maybe you shouldnt have let them in then...
This post was edited by ReturnFormer on Oct 4 2013 01:11pm