Hopefully we can get you to 20%, we don't need this childish posting in PaRD.

Moving goal posts/impossible expectations...classic denialism.

That chart was based on 77 people who responded to the poll..

now now, half of it was based on 75 and the other half was based on 2 people.
lets be clear.

Sorry dude, forgot to math.

So it has self-selection bias then. I didn't read really closely, seen the chart and was like Zing!

What's more childish: disagreeing with science by suggesting that climate change isn't actually occurring OR making fun of all the defective minds that believe such drivel?

In either case, go for it.

You and the rest of the clowns lose for now.

When I wake up tomorrow I'll let you know if I got a suspension. Maybe bet amongst yourselves which post I got it for.

You can do that while continuing to jerk each other off for the rest of the night while whispering conspiracy theories in each others ears.

cya

Gotta love polling 80 people and considering that to be accurate for a million +

If it is completely random it is sufficient. Called the central limit theorem. Or the CLT!

Need 31 or 32 or higher. If certain conditions are met. From the looks of it conditions weren't met but it was sufficient to derail thread to make it now about statistics.

This post was edited by Skinned on May 24 2013 08:07pm

they sent out a survey to 10k people, 3k responded, they showed and broadcasted the reults of the 77 who agreed with the original purpose of it. On top of the fact that the questions were totally fucking stupid.