Quote (dajusta @ May 13 2013 02:12pm)
It was a very political move to make someone Jewish a ruler of their own people.
He's not contending my claim that Pontius Pilate cared about the riots in his prefecture, OR even the fact that Pontius Pilate had an emperor to answer to. I used the term Caesar because the guy was called Tiberius Caesar.
The Romans put client rulers up in provinces that were not located in the "core" regions (Western Europe, Greece). The farther from Rome the less power Rome has over it's provinces so it's simpler to prop up a puppet ruler (Which Herod was) with the head administrator with real power. They did this in much of Asia until they realized client rulers and vassal states are not as reliable as Roman administrators.
Pilate only cared about Judaea as ling as it made money for Rome. That was his job, and "appealing to the Jewish masses" would not make Rome more money. Getting rid of a religious leader however would be, and as I said before it has precedence with the Roman administrators in Gaul, Britannia and Germania executing and subverting the druids.
This post was edited by Caedus on May 13 2013 01:49pm