Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ 9 Oct 2012 02:18)
...except that you linked your other thread which does provide an outside link in the very first post . Why are you lying ?
So, talk about the outside link (and evolution) on other thread ? You guys do not understand anything ?
Quote (AEtheric @ 9 Oct 2012 02:16)
Evolution makes sense without reincarnation. You do not have to be those previous beings in order to come to life as a human. There is no scientific evidence for reincarnation, nor is there any for an eternal spirit. Science shows that there is a brain that is the producer of consciousness, and when you die that brain stops working so your consciousness goes to oblivion. That certainly rules out the existence of reincarnation.
"It does not make sense that human beings would just appear at the top of the evolutionary ladder to reap the benefits of those millions of years of evolution."
Actually, there is no evidence that reincarnation is not true.
Quote (AEtheric @ 9 Oct 2012 02:28)
No, it does make sense. That stupid book makes so many unqualified claims that say something like 'this is logical' or 'this is scientifically true' when there isn't a single bit of logic or science in it, and all it does is shred logic and science to pieces.
There is no evidence that reincarnation is true, and there is evidence that reincarnation isn't true, hence my post #51.
Your brain stops working when your body die, does not mean that your spirit does have to die with it...
You are not your mind, you are the spirit listening to it...
There is no evidence our spirits are not eternal... and the present moment is obviously eternal.
This post was edited by Eti_fr on Oct 8 2012 06:45pm