d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Validation Of The Slippery Slope Argument.
Prev14567821Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 14,659
Joined: Jan 27 2007
Gold: 78.16
Feb 2 2011 07:53pm
looks like the left are at it again
Member
Posts: 8,259
Joined: Oct 18 2009
Gold: 0.00
Feb 2 2011 08:02pm
Quote (Wakeskater77 @ Feb 2 2011 08:44pm)


I'm not suggesting we make smoking out right illegal, but smokers should be prevented from causing other people harm and infringing on other people's liberty.


thread should end now
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
Feb 2 2011 08:05pm
Quote (Cobblestone @ 2 Feb 2011 21:02)
thread should end now


The amount of "Harm" caused by someone smoking a cigarette outside when you are around is pretty negligible at best, you must admit. I mean, I haven't got much of a problem with the ban - I like smoking, but I also like fucking, and despite having been in some parks in perfect fucking weather, I have managed to wait until I got home. But the idea that it's because of the harm that smoking causes seems like a hell of a stretch to me.
Member
Posts: 8,259
Joined: Oct 18 2009
Gold: 0.00
Feb 2 2011 08:24pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Feb 2 2011 09:05pm)
The amount of "Harm" caused by someone smoking a cigarette outside when you are around is pretty negligible at best, you must admit.  I mean, I haven't got much of a problem with the ban - I like smoking, but I also like fucking, and despite having been in some parks in perfect fucking weather, I have managed to wait until I got home.  But the idea that it's because of the harm that smoking causes seems like a hell of a stretch to me.


What about a chain-smoking group of people who swamp out a shady nook in a public park? This is a goofy scenario, but it's possible. Possible and harmful.

# Tobacco smoke has been categorized as a class A carcinogen, positioning it alongside asbestos and arsenic.
# Inhaling smoke coming from other people’s gigarettes can lead to irritation of the eye, headache, cough, sore throat, dizziness and nausea.
# An exposure of merely thirty minutes to cigarette smoke exhaled by other people is considered adequate to diminish the blood flow through the heart.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_smoking#Risk_level




Honestly, I think it's fair to say that it's pretty easy, upon being offended by second-hand smokers, to move yourself to another location on public property. This diminishes any immediate risk but doesn't impede upon infringement of personal liberty.
Member
Posts: 11,885
Joined: May 19 2006
Gold: 1,092.39
Feb 2 2011 08:51pm
Quote (Santara @ Feb 2 2011 08:28pm)
Bring your inhaler.

edit: also, you just reinforced my contention about slippery slopes. If smoking is so fucking bad, ban it. You don't treat smokers as second class citizens and "move them to the back of the bus."


You're such an idiot.
The laws aren't treating anyone as a second class citizen. Smokers are allowed in the parks. They just can't smoke in the park.
They're simply prohibiting a certain activity in a public location. Also is also legal, but is not allowed in most public places.
The same goes for skateboards, cars, ...
I don't understand how you simply don't get this....
Banned
Posts: 22,255
Joined: Jul 23 2010
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 80%
Feb 2 2011 08:56pm
People shouldn't be smoking anyway, I don't see why cigarettes are legal when they're known to cause cancer and have many dangerous chemicals in them. ?-?

It's a good thing this happened, just smoke somewhere else, not everybody likes being around smokers anyhow.

Quote (Santara @ Feb 2 2011 04:28pm)
Bring your inhaler.

edit: also, you just reinforced my contention about slippery slopes. If smoking is so fucking bad, ban it. You don't treat smokers as second class citizens and "move them to the back of the bus."


Our health shouldn't be put at risk because you want to smoke.
We don't smoke, why would we want you to smoke infront of us?
That simple.

This post was edited by Flickr on Feb 2 2011 08:58pm
Member
Posts: 2,132
Joined: Jun 9 2009
Gold: 15.00
Feb 2 2011 09:03pm
Quote (Flickr @ Feb 2 2011 06:56pm)
People shouldn't be smoking anyway, I don't see why cigarettes are legal when they're known to cause cancer and have many dangerous chemicals in them. ?-?


Because the state shouldn't be able to tell us what to do with our bodies.
Banned
Posts: 22,255
Joined: Jul 23 2010
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 80%
Feb 2 2011 09:13pm
Quote (ArcticWolf6 @ Feb 2 2011 07:03pm)
Because the state shouldn't be able to tell us what to do with our bodies.


I said they shouldn't be legal, and people shouldn't be smoking, not that it's okay for the state to tell people you can't smoke.
Marijuana is illegal and people smoke it anyway ~~
Member
Posts: 26,027
Joined: Jan 14 2006
Gold: 110.00
Feb 2 2011 09:14pm
Quote (ArcticWolf6 @ Feb 2 2011 09:03pm)
Because the state shouldn't be able to tell us what to do with our bodies.


According to this logic, people should also be able to urinate in public parks.
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Feb 2 2011 09:16pm
Quote (Santara @ 2 Feb 2011 23:52)
...
New York City has banned smoking OUTSIDE in the wind in parks and on beaches. This is what happens when you give ground on a seemingly innocent law (ban smoking in bars).
You fucking anti-smoking Nazis need to find something useful to do with your time.


&

Quote (Santara @ 3 Feb 2011 00:53)
I don't argue from a utilitarian standpoint, I argue from a civil rights standpoint.
So long as smoking remains a legal activity, I will not condone treating them as second-class citizens.
...


in the various countries smokers contribute more in tax to the system than the cost of smoking imposed illnesses
the healthcare system in many countries would break down without this surplus
and that is the key reason that governments keep it legal - pure hypocrisy

yes, i fully agree with the bolded
why isn't wearing cheap parfum on public transport forbidden?
or eating fresh garlic before work?

if there are so many people concerned, let them declare smoking as illegal
and have some sort of transition legislation for current smokers

This post was edited by brmv on Feb 2 2011 09:16pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14567821Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll