you still havent responded to this

Dumb analogy.

your analogy not mine..

Not sure what you want me to say, probably better now than before which is scary; wonder what the breakdown between attempted and actual assault are.

I expected a "wow, thats a lot worse than i thought. maybe I should be more empathetic to women in general" kind of response.

do you think victims of rape should have to suffer through 9 months of (sometimes irreversible) hell instead of having autonomy over their physical and mental integrity?

that stat isn't intercourse rape, but sexual assault and attempted sexual assult. Not to explain anything away, but did you not see my response prior? I think I listed rape in one of the potential reasons abortion could be used for, although other potential alternatives are possible too.

of course which is why i asked that question again



you're essentially saying that if the mother's life isnt at risk, she should have the baby and give it up for adoption. i'm asking you if the pregnant victim should have the choice. should she?

I think its a scenario where it could be considered, I'm not an expert to nkow the impact on the mother to be raped and then also to abort a child. couldn't that potentially be worse?

I don't like that people automatically assume its a situation that provides relief from a situation without any potential for mental trauma.

This post was edited by Ryvulet on Oct 16 2024 07:37pm

all Im asking is if you think that potential mother should alone be making that choice instead of the government deciding for her