Quote (Meanwhile @ Dec 1 2023 08:21pm)
You said it yourself: he served U.S interests which easily includes: to divide and weaken Europe. Kissinger proposed Ukraine to concede territories to a guy (Putin) who openly declared that he would wait and attack again like Peter the Great...
Glad to see you're starting to understand.
Kissinger believed in a pragmatic foreign policy, his realpolitik, that served national interests even if it meant sacrificing ideals and accepting dictators and repressive regimes. It was not some blind jingoism that supported every intervention nor some weak-kneed pacifism that reflexively opposed them. Kissinger's legacy meant that while a baseline of atrocities and repression was allowed to go unchecked in the world, we avoided global conflict and established an American hegemony. Instead of the decades of total chaos and apocalyptic warfare that preceded him and the risks of nuclear annihilation, we had a pax americana and cemented our position as the only great power.
The measure of Kissinger's pragmatism is that it was opposed to bad decisions which would leave us strategically weaker or cause unnecessary bloodshed and destruction without serving our interests, or even world interests. Even if they had superficial or idealistic arguments behind them. And that's precisely why he opposed America's totally incoherent and self-defeating approach to the Ukraine war. We overthrew a stable democracy and sparked a conflict, which is something Kissinger is perfectly willing to stomach
if it serves our interests, except it doesn't. We undermined ourselves, sabotaged the petrodollar, turned our allies against us, drove a deep wedge with Russia that has ended our ability to align with them against China. Kissinger is the guy who said we should overcome our militant anti-communist hate boner and open relations with China to align against the USSR, when the soviets were our only true competitors. Now China is our only competitor and we're aligning Russia
with themThe point of all this is that the alternative to Kissinger's cynical pragmatism isn't some utopian idealist fantasy where we all get together and sing kumbayah. The alternative is lunacy, nero fiddling while rome burns, the country being led to its own destruction by self-defeating policies which not only cause immense destruction and repression and risk escalating to nuclear conflict, but are actively tearing apart our geopolitical hegemony. Kissinger accepted that we needed to break a few eggs to make an omelette, Obama and Biden alike went and threw the carton of eggs on the ceiling and took a shit on the floor, which is a pretty apt description of the Syrian war lmao