d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Trump's Legal Cases
Prev14567813Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 46,981
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Aug 11 2023 06:09pm
Quote (gnarjay @ Aug 11 2023 04:40pm)
*commits crime*

waahhhhh the court is being weaponized against me wahhh wahhhhhhh

*political opponent's son commits smaller crime*

WE MUST COMMIT MILLIONS OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS TO UNCOVER MORE PICS OF HUNTER BIDENS DICK!


WAAAAAAAAAAAA fraud lefties lie lie lie been lying sinf BOOHOO RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA its not crack heads lap top russia russia russia bu bu bu bu buBUTT now they say stuff n we supposed to believe it. maybe work for TDS kook show. not for the rest of us

a big ol slobbery
BRIIIIITZZZZZZ


This post was edited by TiStuff on Aug 11 2023 06:10pm
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Aug 11 2023 06:14pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Aug 10 2023 07:57pm)
Obstruction of an official proceeding and conspiracy against rights seem like very weak charges in my personal, totally unqualified opinion. They'll never be able to get these two charges to stick.

Generally speaking, it's striking that Trump wasn't actually charged for anything directly related to the storming of the Capitol, yet the MSM and even special counsel Jack Smith himself are going out of their way to frame this case as Trump being charged for Jan 6, rather than for his actions in the weeks before. Which also shows that Smith is NOT a good faith, nonpartisan actor. (For the record: this, in turn, does not say anything about Trump's guilt or the merit of this case.)


If they are able to prove Trump's intent, I think the charges can stick. His goal, which started on election night through January 6th and beyond, was to steal the election.

Incitement is a very difficult crime to prove. I don't know how Jack Smith including the insurrection as part of the narrative of the indictment makes him a partisan, bad faith actor, unless you consider opposition to a sitting president trying to steal an election he lost(and his supporters storming the Capitol to block certification of that election) a partisan issue.

The importance of this case really can't be overstated. Trump ended America's tradition of a peaceful transfer of power, at least in the sense that the transfer of power was not peaceful because of his efforts to steal the election and the attempted insurrection by his supporters. His actions had no political consequence beyond an impeachment without a conviction. He's the heavy favorite to win the Republican nomination... his approval rating remained stable after he attempted to end American democracy as we know it. So Congress failed to hold him accountable. Maybe the Justice Department can do it. This case is one of the most consequential in American history.

This post was edited by IceMage on Aug 11 2023 06:42pm
Member
Posts: 54,105
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Aug 11 2023 08:06pm
Quote (IceMage @ 12 Aug 2023 02:14)
If they are able to prove Trump's intent, I think the charges can stick.

To prove intent, they will probably have to prove that Trump knew he had lost the election and was deliberately lying when he claimed otherwise. That's a tough task.

Quote
Incitement is a very difficult crime to prove. I don't know how Jack Smith including the insurrection as part of the narrative of the indictment makes him a partisan, bad faith actor

He is intentionally misleading the public about the crimes for which he's prosecuting Trump. Legally speaking, it does nothing for his case, so why does he do that? Well, Jan 6 is a much more visual and striking event than Trump's phone calls with state officials etc., so bringing it up and refreshing Americans' memory of that day is politically harmful to Trump (and really the whole GOP brand).

Needless to say that Jack Smith joined the DoJ during the Obama administration. Oh, and his wife was literally the producer of a glowing documentary on Michelle Obama.


Quote
unless you consider opposition to a sitting president trying to steal an election he lost(and his supporters storming the Capitol to block certification of that election) a partisan issue.

Smith is free to personally oppose the actions of Trump, but it's his job to put his personal feelings aside and conduct his investigation in a nonpartisan fashion. In particular, he shouldn't needlessly carry out his job in a way that pays partisan dividends for the party of the incumbent administration. A special counsel is appointed specifically to avoid any semblance of partiality in highly political cases - and he's failing this aspect of his job.

Since you're so concerned with American democracy and the integrity of its institutions, you should understand how dicey it is when the president lets the DoJ (which ultimately answers to him) carry out an investigation into his most likely rival in the upcoming election, and how highly corrosive it would be to American democracy when this investigations is perceived as politically charged.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Aug 11 2023 08:07pm
Member
Posts: 19,240
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 7,104.95
Aug 11 2023 08:11pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Aug 11 2023 07:06pm)
To prove intent, they will probably have to prove that Trump knew he had lost the election and was deliberately lying when he claimed otherwise. That's a tough task.



have you seen the mountains of evidence they have? then theres all the people that have flipped, Trump's own words, tweets, etc. I dont think the cases would be where they are if they didnt have enough evidence to nail him
Member
Posts: 46,981
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Aug 11 2023 10:40pm
thread topic
Trump's REEEEEEEEEEgal Cases
Banned
Posts: 89
Joined: Aug 10 2023
Gold: 0.00
Aug 11 2023 10:40pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Aug 11 2023 06:40pm)
thread topic
Trump's REEEEEEEEEEgal Cases


Why did you run away?
Member
Posts: 46,981
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Aug 11 2023 10:42pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Aug 11 2023 07:06pm)
To prove intent, they will probably have to prove that Trump knew he had lost the election and was deliberately lying when he claimed otherwise. That's a tough task.


He is intentionally misleading the public about the crimes for which he's prosecuting Trump. Legally speaking, it does nothing for his case, so why does he do that? Well, Jan 6 is a much more visual and striking event than Trump's phone calls with state officials etc., so bringing it up and refreshing Americans' memory of that day is politically harmful to Trump (and really the whole GOP brand).

Needless to say that Jack Smith joined the DoJ during the Obama administration. Oh, and his wife was literally the producer of a glowing documentary on Michelle Obama.



Smith is free to personally oppose the actions of Trump, but it's his job to put his personal feelings aside and conduct his investigation in a nonpartisan fashion. In particular, he shouldn't needlessly carry out his job in a way that pays partisan dividends for the party of the incumbent administration. A special counsel is appointed specifically to avoid any semblance of partiality in highly political cases - and he's failing this aspect of his job.

Since you're so concerned with American democracy and the integrity of its institutions, you should understand how dicey it is when the president lets the DoJ (which ultimately answers to him) carry out an investigation into his most likely rival in the upcoming election, and how highly corrosive it would be to American democracy when this investigations is perceived as politically charged.


which happened after trump announced he was running
Member
Posts: 49,893
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Aug 11 2023 10:57pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Aug 10 2023 11:38am)
when have leftie frauds ever been critical
russia russia russia REEEEEEEEEEEEE

OR perhaps we just tire of leftie criminals


You come across as completely deranged, i am guessing you are a grown adult try to act like it.
Member
Posts: 46,981
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Aug 11 2023 11:03pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Aug 11 2023 09:57pm)
You come across as completely deranged, i am guessing you are a grown adult try to act like it.


you been duped by lies from the very beginning. did it start with the peepee tapes??? or was the first lie when all the fake news was running around saying trump would disavow whyte supremacy or was it russia russia russai maddow all the time. part of growing up is not getting played for a chump so easily, make it happen
Member
Posts: 49,893
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Aug 11 2023 11:12pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Aug 12 2023 03:03pm)
you been duped by lies from the very beginning. did it start with the peepee tapes??? or was the first lie when all the fake news was running around saying trump would disavow whyte supremacy or was it russia russia russai maddow all the time. part of growing up is not getting played for a chump so easily, make it happen


Part of growing up is realising your hero's may not be as cool as you thought.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14567813Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll