d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Fake Rape Acusation Against Donald Trump Dismissed
Prev14567811Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 105,131
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
May 10 2023 12:50pm
Quote (thesnipa @ May 10 2023 01:43pm)
if you get to sit on one you'll find out what voir dire is and why your post sounds so silly.





I know what it is. Did you read the article?
The lawyers didn't even know who the jurors were.

The jurors "promised" they weren't biased. We know the judge is biased.

You can sell this fair trail bit to someone else. :)
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
May 10 2023 01:32pm
Quote (Goomshill @ May 10 2023 11:07am)
I'm genuinely surprised they didn't give she-skeletor a $5 billion reward. Do you really think Trump could get a fair trial with a jury of New Yorkers? Afaik theres still zero evidence he ever met this woman or to support her claim, and all her side had to do was say Trump grabs women by the pussy.


There's more trump voters in NYC than in Wyoming and Montana combined.
Member
Posts: 19,190
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
May 10 2023 01:49pm
Quote (thesnipa @ May 10 2023 09:59am)
you should read that again, and then read a book that teaches you how to read better.


I read it just fine.
Member
Posts: 92,959
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 10 2023 01:51pm
Quote (D_urRRR @ May 10 2023 02:49pm)
I read it just fine.


but, u didnt tho.
Member
Posts: 19,190
Joined: Nov 12 2005
Gold: 30.70
May 10 2023 02:13pm
Quote (thesnipa @ May 10 2023 03:51pm)
but, u didnt tho.


You poor thing...
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 10 2023 02:25pm
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
May 10 2023 02:47pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ May 10 2023 12:46pm)
My understanding is that the judge went with an anonymous jury due to a history of Trump lambasting the court/juries and wanting to avoid any harassment by Trump supporters.


I think that rationale on its own is fine, they clearly would have be subject to some form of harassment. The alternative, though, is that Trump gets judged by a random subsection of Manhattan, where the average voter would happily shoot him dead.
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
May 10 2023 03:14pm
Quote (bogie160 @ May 10 2023 01:47pm)
I think that rationale on its own is fine, they clearly would have be subject to some form of harassment. The alternative, though, is that Trump gets judged by a random subsection of Manhattan, where the average voter would happily shoot him dead.


And they dismissed anyone who felt that way. They still did voir dire.
Member
Posts: 22,437
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
May 10 2023 03:48pm
Quote (Sioux @ May 10 2023 02:14pm)
And they dismissed anyone who felt that way. They still did voir dire.


This is the part that keeps coming to my mind as well. It seems to be the case that:

Not liable verdict: "Well then, this was a fair trial".

Liable verdict: "There's no way Trump could have a fair trial anywhere in New York".
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 10 2023 04:18pm
Quote (D_urRRR @ May 10 2023 02:49pm)
I read it just fine.


Please explain how "Trump was found liable for defamation because the jury thought it was more likely than not that Trump committed sexual assault" means "sexual assault was not committed".

Go real slow for me, because it seems I'm not the only one having trouble following your logic.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14567811Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll