d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Death Penalty For Pedophiles Pass In Fl
Prev14567Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 27,144
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Apr 22 2023 12:25pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ 22 Apr 2023 14:20)
Don't tell me you're too dumb to use parental control on your devices.



Children play the games their parents buy them.



Have not conducted research on child masturbation here, can't comment.


Ya because I am going to turn on parental controls for ads that show on youtube or I will turn on parental controls for the mall ads that we walk by or Mini Miss teen Florida showing on Fox channel. How old are you bro?

Your second point is dumb. So you agree with me that children are exposed to these things in games all the time then. Thanks

I know like I said you know nothing about children. Maybe if you were a father, you know, and had kids, you know, you might know things about children. The dark cold basement around you I would hope you arent conducting research on child masturbation there bro thats illegal i think :unsure:
Member
Posts: 27,144
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Apr 22 2023 12:30pm
Quote (Crunkt @ 22 Apr 2023 14:25)
Ya because I am going to turn on parental controls for ads that show on youtube or I will turn on parental controls for the mall ads that we walk by or Mini Miss teen Florida showing on Fox channel. How old are you bro?

Your second point is dumb. So you agree with me that children are exposed to these things in games all the time then. Thanks

I know like I said you know nothing about children. Maybe if you were a father, you know, and had kids, you know, you might know things about children. The dark cold basement around you I would hope you arent conducting research on child masturbation there bro thats illegal i think :unsure:


Any parent with a brain that has checked their kids search history knows these things.
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 22 2023 12:34pm
Quote (Crunkt @ Apr 22 2023 09:25pm)
Your second point is dumb. So you agree with me that children are exposed to these things in games all the time then. Thanks


Only if you were stupid enough as a parent to buy them those games. You sound like you might be.

Quote (Crunkt @ Apr 22 2023 09:25pm)
Ya because I am going to turn on parental controls for ads that show on youtube or I will turn on parental controls for the mall ads that we walk by or Mini Miss teen Florida showing on Fox channel. How old are you bro?


Youtube? LoL

Pre-teens should have no access to internet at all, but that will be a "shocking & weird" concept for cattle like you.

Luckily the publicised decisions of people with first hand awareness of the possible harm are out there to enlighten your opposites.


Member
Posts: 27,144
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Apr 22 2023 12:38pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ 22 Apr 2023 14:34)
Pre-teens should have no access to internet at all,


This is precisely why you need to leave your basement dude.

All of your arguments are nulled and every opinion you have is void if you are taking that stance to be honest.

thank god you are not in charge of solving any problems.

ITT: Old man angrily shakes hand at internet

This post was edited by Crunkt on Apr 22 2023 12:39pm
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 22 2023 12:40pm
Quote (Crunkt @ Apr 22 2023 09:38pm)
This is precisely why you need to leave your basement dude.

All of your arguments are void and every opinion you have is nulled if you are taking that stance to be honest.

thank god you are not in charge of solving any problems.


say moo, cattle

Member
Posts: 27,144
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Apr 22 2023 12:43pm
Quote (HeLiCaL @ 22 Apr 2023 14:40)


But we were arguing about whether or not it is appropriate for children to be exposed to explicit sexual fetish gear and I am telling you that is fine because it happens all the damn time.

We aren't arguing about social media and its effects on children...

Come on old man stay on topic
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Apr 22 2023 12:50pm
Quote (Crunkt @ Apr 22 2023 09:43pm)
But we were arguing about whether or not it is appropriate for children to be exposed to explicit sexual fetish gear and I am telling you that is fine because it happens all the damn time.


What happens all the time to children of idiot parents - does not dictate if its normal or not. (its not)

Quote (Crunkt @ Apr 22 2023 09:43pm)
We aren't arguing about social media and its effects on children...


You brought up YouTube 5 minutes ago nimrod :rofl:

Quote (Crunkt @ Apr 22 2023 09:43pm)
Come on old man stay on topic


About staying on topic:

Have you found the exact paragraph where (you falsely claimed) it says that in Florida dressing up in explicit sexual fetish gear in front of minors is punishable by death, and not merely a deserved jail sentence?

This post was edited by HeLiCaL on Apr 22 2023 12:51pm
Member
Posts: 15,801
Joined: Jul 9 2021
Gold: 291.00
Apr 22 2023 01:24pm
If my abuser got the dp, that would actually make me feel sick. Since I didn't vote. I'd rather have them just be locked up. Don't want that shit on my conscious tbh

Member
Posts: 38,850
Joined: Aug 30 2005
Gold: 507.00
Apr 22 2023 01:29pm
Quote (ChocolateCoveredGummyBears @ Apr 22 2023 02:24pm)
If my abuser got the dp, that would actually make me feel sick. Since I didn't vote. I'd rather have them just be locked up. Don't want that shit on my conscious tbh

It'll make it's way to the supreme court anyways. It was previously ruled that the death penalty was only reserved for murderers. There are other crimes that can get the death penalty. There have been none on record since the ruling below and no such person at the moment is on death row for a crime other than murder currently.

In 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court in Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584, held that the death penalty for the rape of an adult was “grossly disproportionate” and an “excessive punishment,” and hence was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment. The Court looked at the relatively few states that allowed the death penalty for rape and the few death sentences that had been handed down.

Some states passed new laws allowing the death penalty for the rape of a child. In 2007, the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the death sentence for Patrick Kennedy for the rape of his step-daughter, LOUISIANA v. KENNEDY (No. 05-KA-1981, May 22, 2007). Kennedy was convicted in 2003. However, Louisiana’s law was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 25, 2008. See Kennedy v. Louisiana for more information. This decision also held that the death penalty would be disproportionate for any offense against an individual that did not involve death of the victim.

This post was edited by foxnews on Apr 22 2023 01:32pm
Member
Posts: 15,801
Joined: Jul 9 2021
Gold: 291.00
Apr 22 2023 01:33pm
Quote (foxnews @ Apr 22 2023 12:29pm)
It'll make it's way to the supreme court anyways. It was previously ruled that the death penalty was only reserved for murderers.

In 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court in Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584, held that the death penalty for the rape of an adult was “grossly disproportionate” and an “excessive punishment,” and hence was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment. The Court looked at the relatively few states that allowed the death penalty for rape and the few death sentences that had been handed down.

Some states passed new laws allowing the death penalty for the rape of a child. In 2007, the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the death sentence for Patrick Kennedy for the rape of his step-daughter, LOUISIANA v. KENNEDY (No. 05-KA-1981, May 22, 2007). Kennedy was convicted in 2003. However, Louisiana’s law was struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 25, 2008. See Kennedy v. Louisiana for more information. This decision also held that the death penalty would be disproportionate for any offense against an individual that did not involve death of the victim.


Yeah I find it fascinating the different perspectives of this. For example, if it was a family member, then I'm more inclined for it. Because it would affect me probably more than what I already endured (and know how bad it is). But when it's solely based on what happened to me, I don't think I'd vote yes.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14567Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll