Quote (Black XistenZ @ 13 Jan 2022 18:26)
I was not moving the goalposts, I was merely pointing out the psychosocial and historical reality of human attraction and mating to correct your warped perception.
Also, nice way to distort my statements via selective quotes. I specifically pointed out that peeking at these naked models does make Trump a perv. I also specifically stressed that it is a good thing that age of consent laws and social norms have adapted to our modern societies in which the social coming of age lags behind the biological one.
That's a much fairer criticism which got lost in the shuffle because you hackishly had to call Trump a pedo when the examples you cited were categorically unsuited to support this claim. :rolleyes:
By bringing up the "pedo"-argument, you shifted the debate away from "Trump is an asshole who abused his power to satisfy his sexual desires" to "Trump is sexually abnormal".
A lot of the science on trans people and how to best deal with their needs belongs to psychology, rather than medicine. You yourself have repeatedly stressed what a pitiful field of barely-science psychology is and that we shouldn't ascribe much credibility to the vast majority of their findings.
more lies from the trump shill. as a matter of fact, in one of my replies to your posts i specifically stated that "nothing of that proves either of them is a pedophile" (
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=67278491&f=119&p=602171158 ), so you strawmanning me here to save face just further illustrates your dishonesty.
what actually happened is that YOU suggested clinton was more likely to have slept with underage girls multiple times. i merely pointed out how all the actual FACTS (closeness with epstein and maxwell, general attraction to underage girls, actually acting upon it, multiple sexual harrassment and rape accusations, number of extramarital affairs with younger women...) point towards the opposite. the only thing you have is your feeling that clinton just has to be worse because he's a (D).
also, don't pretend you weren't trying to downplay trump's sexualisation of minors when you suggested he was just "
taking a peek" (rather than what he actually did: deliberately enter their dressing rooms to "inspect" them while they were naked), and tried to make them appear more mature and professional ("
smoking hot 16 or 17 year old models") than they really were - some just 15 year old beauty pageant contestants. i mean, it's almost impressive how easily those lies and misrepresentations come to you, but all the rationalisations and attempts to downplay trump's disgusting behaviour won't change the facts, no matter how hard you try.
just to be perfectly clear, fuck bill clinton. guy is a sleazeball, and if he touched children, he should rot in jail for it. i just find it pathetic that you can't even acknowledge the fact that trump's close friendship with epstein, his multiple visits at his events, his considering of a pardon and well-wishing for ghislaine maxwell was at the very least shady af, and that his sexual behaviour is more than just creepy, without trying to put a partisan spin on it by pretending bill clinton is probably even worse. you just can't help it, can you? hacks gonna hack, i guess...