Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 5 Jan 2022 23:15)
You are buying into propaganda again. Parler was "deplatformed" for being unable to moderate their content. There were death threats among other things that they were notified about that went unaddressed for months. There was no concerted effort to deplatform them based on political affiliation, and Parler still exists. How about if you want a platform, don't flagrantly violate the terms of service? It's not like the president isn't extensively having his words covered in basically every outlet anyway. He is the president. Don't be stupid and imply the president doesn't still have the widest reach of literally anybody in the country even without his twitter account.
Yeah, right, keep telling that to yourself.

You claim that Parler was leaving flagrant violations of the terms of service of their web hosts unaddressed for months. Then why did the moment AWS et al. decided to finally pull the plug on them occur at the exact same moment Trump was banned from Twitter and Facebook and threatened to take a big chunk of their Republican-leaning users with him? What a """""strange""""" """"""""""""""""""""""coincidence""""""""""""""""""""!

Quote
Unless you advocate for rewriting the first amendment you will never have a basis in American law to require hosting of political speech by a private company. That goes for the president, any platform, or any person. Hosting speech is just as much a political expression as saying it yourself, and it has the absolute maximum level of protection that you can give freedom of speech in America.
Of course you cannot force private companies to host particular speech. You can, however, break up monopolies or trusts.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jan 5 2022 05:40pm