d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Mar A Lago Raided By Fbi
Prev14849505152233Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 27,149
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Aug 10 2022 06:00pm
Quote (Ghot @ 10 Aug 2022 18:10)
A warrant is one thing.... how you acquired the warrant is another thing completely.
Steele dossier, anyone?


Ill take Alex Jones texts for 1200 dollars bob

Quote (TiStuff @ 10 Aug 2022 19:43)
u mean hilary smashed all those hard drives for no reason whatsoever awwww poor lil innocent boo boo


I'd smash Hilary

Like a thank you fuck you know?

This post was edited by Crunkt on Aug 10 2022 06:01pm
Member
Posts: 27,149
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Aug 10 2022 06:13pm
Im taking

4.5:1 Barron Trump
2:1 Melania
10:1 Eric
10:1 don
3:1 Hilary
0.5:1 Dark Brandon

any takers any takers lets gooo lets goooo show me your money letsssss gooo

Member
Posts: 54,145
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Aug 10 2022 06:13pm
Quote (Crunkt @ 11 Aug 2022 02:00)
I'd smash Hilary

Like a thank you fuck you know?


Member
Posts: 27,149
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Aug 10 2022 06:18pm
Quote (fender @ 10 Aug 2022 19:08)


Those kids would be very upset if they could read
Member
Posts: 47,114
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Aug 10 2022 06:40pm
Quote (Crunkt @ Aug 10 2022 05:13pm)
Im taking

4.5:1 Barron Trump
2:1 Melania
10:1 Eric
10:1 don
3:1 Hilary
0.5:1 Dark Brandon

any takers any takers lets gooo lets goooo show me your money letsssss gooo

https://i.imgur.com/2qrsyae.png


wut odds steve bannon does any time?
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Aug 10 2022 06:43pm
Quote (fender @ Aug 10 2022 07:08pm)


Yes, but none of that is true. It has to be one of the sloppiest defense jobs I've ever seen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy#Background

Quote
In May 2016, the Department's Office of the Inspector General Steve A. Linick released an 83-page report about the State Department's email practices.[57][58][59] The Inspector General was unable to find evidence that Clinton had ever sought approval from the State Department staff for her use of a private email server, determining that if Clinton had sought approval, Department staff would have declined her setup because of the "security risks in doing so."[57] Aside from security risks, the report stated that "she did not comply with the Department's policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act."[60] Each of these findings contradicted what Clinton and her aides had been saying up to that point.[61][62][63] The report also stated that Clinton and her senior aides declined to speak with the investigators, while the previous four Secretaries of State did so.[57]

Quote
A March 2, 2015 New York Times article broke the story that the Benghazi panel had discovered that Clinton exclusively used her own private email server rather than a government-issued one throughout her time as Secretary of State, and that her aides took no action to preserve emails sent or received from her personal accounts as required by law.[42][43][44]

Quote
Dan Metcalfe, a former head of the Justice Department's Office of Information and Privacy, said this gave her even tighter control over her emails by not involving a third party such as Google and helped prevent their disclosure by Congressional subpoena. He added: "She managed successfully to insulate her official emails, categorically, from the FOIA, both during her tenure at State and long after her departure from it—perhaps forever," making it "a blatant circumvention of the FOIA by someone who unquestionably knows better."[42][52]


Quote
Experts such as Metcalfe agree that these practices are allowed by federal law assuming that the material is not supposed to be classified

Quote
...Blumenthal did not have a security clearance when he received material from Clinton that has since been characterized as classified by the State Department.[38][39]


Quote
The FBI investigation found that 110 messages contained information that was classified at the time it was sent. Sixty-five of those emails were found to contain information classified as "Secret;" more than 20 contained "Top-Secret" information.

Quote
Clinton personally wrote 104 of the 2,093 emails that were retroactively[115][116][117] found to contain information classified as "confidential."[57][118] Of the remaining emails that were classified after they were sent, Clinton aide Jake Sullivan wrote the most, at 215.[115]
Member
Posts: 27,149
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Aug 10 2022 06:53pm
SAFE CONTENTS PHOTOS OFFICIALLY LEAKED:







----





Quote (bogie160 @ 10 Aug 2022 20:43)
Yes, but none of that is true. It has to be one of the sloppiest defense jobs I've ever seen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy#Background




This post was edited by Crunkt on Aug 10 2022 07:03pm
Member
Posts: 54,145
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Aug 10 2022 07:40pm
Quote (thundercock @ 10 Aug 2022 23:57)
If you're worried about legislative whiplash due to the filibuster going away, you're going to see WAY more of that in the future:
https://www.axios.com/2022/07/22/trump-2025-radical-plan-second-term
https://www.axios.com/2022/07/23/donald-trump-news-schedule-f-executive-order

A very interesting read, thanks for posting! This whole "Schedule F" scheme is big yikes. :wacko:
I totally agree with the problem diagnosis that "the nonpartisan civil service is a farce and that it has been filled with activist liberals who have been undermining GOP presidents for decades". The swamp definitely has to be drained.

But it cannot be the solution to just replace the current swamp with Trump's own swamp full of loyalists. The true solution has to lie in limiting the ability of career officials to thwart the policies and agenda of the (democratically legitimized) president via laws and guidelines; and in making sure that the political and ideological makeup of the civil service more closely reflects that of the country as a whole, rather than skewing so heavily toward technocratic liberalism.

Scaring civil servants into blind obedience or stacking the agencies with trumpists would effectively destroy the civil service, rather than restore it. And in the long run, thinking beyond a potential second Trump term, I think that it would definitely unravel the republic if the civil service was exposed to a partisan game of chess about institutional capture, with both sides trying to stuff it with as many overtly partisan henchmen as possible whenever they get the chance. Effectively, "Schedule F" means giving up on the idea that any institution can or should remain above the partisan fray.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Aug 10 2022 07:40pm
Member
Posts: 9,899
Joined: May 7 2006
Gold: 550.00
Aug 10 2022 08:08pm
Quote (Crunkt @ Aug 10 2022 05:13pm)
Im taking

4.5:1 Barron Trump
2:1 Melania
10:1 Eric
10:1 don
3:1 Hilary
0.5:1 Dark Brandon

any takers any takers lets gooo lets goooo show me your money letsssss gooo

https://i.imgur.com/2qrsyae.png


When was the last time DeSantis was at Mar a lago? Guys desperate to be president in 2024 and has all the motive in the world to clear the field.
Member
Posts: 54,145
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Aug 10 2022 08:46pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev14849505152233Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll