Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 2 2020 04:42pm)
you spent a whole lotta time arguing that a right facing eagle isn't JUST a nazi eagle, i never claimed it was. not all right facing eagles are nazi eagles, but all nazi eagles are right facing. its a pretty simple square/rectangle mix up, a strawman you beat into a pile of pulp.
should i have more clearly pointed this out? well, i could have, but why stop you from looking like an idiot when all the context clues where there for any non-sperg to read? and i of course did even try to clearly put it in terms that would permeate your skull, they didnt, but i did try.
is that accurate to what happened? no, lol. why do you waste time saying shit like that? i clearly wasnt trying to be accurate, you know it, all of pard knows it, i know it, but still you point things like this out for what? to get some "valid intellectual points". do you puff your chest out while typing to declare i wasnt being accurate and was grossly condensing 10 posts into 4 hyperbolic bullet points? lol, pathetic.
i editted what post to put what part at which end? the post above #4889 i edited to add parenthesis to the second line to change it from a statement to an action. i could have put quotes on the other (disclaimer: not entirely accurate) "statements" tho, that was an option.
I wasn't the idiot in this exchange.
You were wrong and chose to double down, attack me and misrepresent me instead of admitting it.
Yes we know you weren't trying to be accurate.
You were trying to dishonestly frame the exchange more in your favor.
Great clarification!
I care about being honest and accurate more than you do, and that is supposed to be some sort of flaw in a political discussion subforum?
You got me there!
Lol I corrected you. What a bad thing!
You really showed me!
If that is the metric used for winning a political argument then you were super dominant.
Many inaccuracies and dishonest posts. Congrats!
This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jul 2 2020 02:50pm