d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2020 > Trump Vs. Pack O' Dems
Prev1488489490491492983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 2 2020 02:35pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jul 2 2020 03:22pm)
Go away, worm.

He shared and supported the left's narrative on the eagle shirt, and was using it to attack Trump and his staff, and mocking those who would disagree.

I decided to post facts related to that story that refuted and damaged the left's narrative.
He could have chosen to be honest and reflective and accept what I posted.
Instead he chose to double down and attack me, and later cried strawman and retreated to a narrower hole.


You can think that all you want, but I can have meaningful conversations with 90% of the forum, even those I vehemently disagree with, and you cannot have meaningful conversations with literally a single user on the entire forum.
Member
Posts: 53,548
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
Jul 2 2020 02:39pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jul 2 2020 04:35pm)
You can think that all you want, but I can have meaningful conversations with 90% of the forum, even those I vehemently disagree with, and you cannot have meaningful conversations with literally a single user on the entire forum.


Oh no you claimed I cant have meaningful conversations. :rolleyes:

Half your posts are you butting in and saying scummy things and lying about myself and others rather than addressing the topic and content of the posts.
Such meaning and intellect.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 2 2020 02:41pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jul 2 2020 03:39pm)
Oh no you claimed I cant have meaningful conversations. :rolleyes:

Half your posts are you butting in and saying scummy things and lying about myself and others rather than addressing the topic and content of the posts.
Such meaning and intellect.


Can you list a single person you have had a meaningful conversation with in the last year on this forum?

I have them all the time with Xisten, snipa, and sometimes even Goom even though Goom and I are at odds on basically every subject.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jul 2 2020 02:44pm
Member
Posts: 92,957
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Jul 2 2020 02:42pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jul 2 2020 03:34pm)
1. "inb4" is not a valid intellectual tool that rightfully dismisses evidence inconvenient to your narrative.

2. A plethora of eagles being used as American symbolism is a relevant fact, regardless of which way they are facing.

3. You edited your post to include that part at the end.

4. Imagine being so dishonest you claim thats an accurate representation of the exchange.

Claiming you don't take me seriously as an excuse to justify failing to properly address and refute what I say or defend your claims is representative of your anti-intellectualism.
I'm not begging anyone to take me seriously.


you spent a whole lotta time arguing that a right facing eagle isn't JUST a nazi eagle, i never claimed it was. not all right facing eagles are nazi eagles, but all nazi eagles are right facing. its a pretty simple square/rectangle mix up, a strawman you beat into a pile of pulp.

should i have more clearly pointed this out? well, i could have, but why stop you from looking like an idiot when all the context clues where there for any non-sperg to read? and i of course did even try to clearly put it in terms that would permeate your skull, they didnt, but i did try.

is that accurate to what happened? no, lol. why do you waste time saying shit like that? i clearly wasnt trying to be accurate, you know it, all of pard knows it, i know it, but still you point things like this out for what? to get some "valid intellectual points". do you puff your chest out while typing to declare i wasnt being accurate and was grossly condensing 10 posts into 4 hyperbolic bullet points? lol, pathetic.

i editted what post to put what part at which end? the post above #4889 i edited to add parenthesis to the second line to change it from a statement to an action. i could have put quotes on the other (disclaimer: not entirely accurate) "statements" tho, that was an option.
Member
Posts: 53,548
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
Jul 2 2020 02:49pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jul 2 2020 04:42pm)
you spent a whole lotta time arguing that a right facing eagle isn't JUST a nazi eagle, i never claimed it was. not all right facing eagles are nazi eagles, but all nazi eagles are right facing. its a pretty simple square/rectangle mix up, a strawman you beat into a pile of pulp.

should i have more clearly pointed this out? well, i could have, but why stop you from looking like an idiot when all the context clues where there for any non-sperg to read? and i of course did even try to clearly put it in terms that would permeate your skull, they didnt, but i did try.

is that accurate to what happened? no, lol. why do you waste time saying shit like that? i clearly wasnt trying to be accurate, you know it, all of pard knows it, i know it, but still you point things like this out for what? to get some "valid intellectual points". do you puff your chest out while typing to declare i wasnt being accurate and was grossly condensing 10 posts into 4 hyperbolic bullet points? lol, pathetic.

i editted what post to put what part at which end? the post above #4889 i edited to add parenthesis to the second line to change it from a statement to an action. i could have put quotes on the other (disclaimer: not entirely accurate) "statements" tho, that was an option.


I wasn't the idiot in this exchange.
You were wrong and chose to double down, attack me and misrepresent me instead of admitting it.

Yes we know you weren't trying to be accurate.
You were trying to dishonestly frame the exchange more in your favor.
Great clarification!

I care about being honest and accurate more than you do, and that is supposed to be some sort of flaw in a political discussion subforum?
You got me there!
Lol I corrected you. What a bad thing!
You really showed me!

If that is the metric used for winning a political argument then you were super dominant.
Many inaccuracies and dishonest posts. Congrats!

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jul 2 2020 02:50pm
Member
Posts: 61,687
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Jul 2 2020 02:53pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jul 2 2020 01:49pm)
I wasn't the idiot in this exchange.
You were wrong and chose to double down, attack me and misrepresent me instead of admitting it.

Yes we know you weren't trying to be accurate.
You were trying to dishonestly frame the exchange more in your favor.
Great clarification!

I care about being honest and accurate more than you do, and that is supposed to be some sort of flaw in a political discussion subforum?
You got me there!
Lol I corrected you. What a bad thing!
You really showed me!

If that is the metric used for winning a political argument then you were super dominant.
Many inaccuracies and dishonest posts. Congrats!



It’s so sad seeing fascists feeling so attacked.

Your feelings are valid.

But you aren’t.
Member
Posts: 53,548
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 7,908.33
Jul 2 2020 02:55pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ Jul 2 2020 04:53pm)
It’s so sad seeing fascists feeling so attacked.

Your feelings are valid.

But you aren’t.


Hang on let me turn to the left so im not fascist anymore
Member
Posts: 61,687
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Jul 2 2020 02:56pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jul 2 2020 01:55pm)
Hang on let me turn to the left so im not fascist anymore



That would be nice but I don’t have much faith in your ability to follow though.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jul 2 2020 03:01pm
Quote (cambovenzi @ Jul 2 2020 01:55pm)
Hang on let me turn to the left so im not fascist anymore


I have a few questions for you. Do you think the eagle facing the right was an intentional design choice? Do you recognize that the eagle facing to the right is typically symbolic of war/conflict in America?
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Sep 10 2007
Gold: 25.00
Jul 2 2020 03:04pm
Quote (thundercock @ Jul 2 2020 05:01pm)
I have a few questions for you. Do you think the eagle facing the right was an intentional design choice? Do you recognize that the eagle facing to the right is typically symbolic of war/conflict in America?


The logo they used is entirely ripped from a vector image website. They didn't alter it themselves at all other than adding text, super lazy.

Their intentions behind choosing that specific logo is anyone's guess. Maybe Steven Miller had some say in the matter... Wouldn't surprise me at all.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1488489490491492983Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll